» Articles » PMID: 36434508

Use of Multimodal Dataset in AI for Detecting Glaucoma Based on Fundus Photographs Assessed with OCT: Focus Group Study on High Prevalence of Myopia

Overview
Journal BMC Med Imaging
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Nov 26
PMID 36434508
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Glaucoma is one of the major causes of blindness; it is estimated that over 110 million people will be affected by glaucoma worldwide by 2040. Research on glaucoma detection using deep learning technology has been increasing, but the diagnosis of glaucoma in a large population with high incidence of myopia remains a challenge. This study aimed to provide a decision support system for the automatic detection of glaucoma using fundus images, which can be applied for general screening, especially in areas of high incidence of myopia.

Methods: A total of 1,155 fundus images were acquired from 667 individuals with a mean axial length of 25.60 ± 2.0 mm at the National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsinchu Br. These images were graded based on the findings of complete ophthalmology examinations, visual field test, and optical coherence tomography into three groups: normal (N, n = 596), pre-perimetric glaucoma (PPG, n = 66), and glaucoma (G, n = 493), and divided into a training-validation (N: 476, PPG: 55, G: 373) and test (N: 120, PPG: 11, G: 120) sets. A multimodal model with the Xception model as image feature extraction and machine learning algorithms [random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), dense neural network (DNN), and others] was applied.

Results: The Xception model classified the N, PPG, and G groups with 93.9% of the micro-average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) with tenfold cross-validation. Although normal and glaucoma sensitivity can reach 93.51% and 86.13% respectively, the PPG sensitivity was only 30.27%. The AUROC increased to 96.4% in the N + PPG and G groups. The multimodal model with the N + PPG and G groups showed that the AUROCs of RF, SVM, and DNN were 99.56%, 99.59%, and 99.10%, respectively; The N and PPG + G groups had less than 1% difference. The test set showed an overall 3%-5% less AUROC than the validation results.

Conclusion: The multimodal model had good AUROC while detecting glaucoma in a population with high incidence of myopia. The model shows the potential for general automatic screening and telemedicine, especially in Asia.

Trial Registration: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsinchu Branch (no. NTUHHCB 108-025-E).

Citing Articles

Development and validation of CNN-MLP models for predicting anti-VEGF therapy outcomes in diabetic macular edema.

Leng X, Shi R, Xu Z, Zhang H, Xu W, Zhu K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30270.

PMID: 39632987 PMC: 11618618. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82007-4.


Big data in visual field testing for glaucoma.

Pham A, Pan A, Yohannan J Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2024; 14(3):289-298.

PMID: 39430358 PMC: 11488814. DOI: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00059.


Application of artificial intelligence in glaucoma care: An updated review.

Wu J, Lin S, Moghimi S Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2024; 14(3):340-351.

PMID: 39430354 PMC: 11488804. DOI: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00044.


Comprehensive assessment of glaucoma in patients with high myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a discussion of structural and functional imaging modalities.

Quiroz-Reyes M, Quiroz-Gonzalez E, Quiroz-Gonzalez M, Lima-Gomez V Int Ophthalmol. 2024; 44(1):405.

PMID: 39392516 PMC: 11469969. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03321-4.


The utilization of artificial intelligence in glaucoma: diagnosis versus screening.

AlShawabkeh M, AlRyalat S, Al Bdour M, Alnimat A, Al-Akhras M Front Ophthalmol (Lausanne). 2024; 4:1368081.

PMID: 38984126 PMC: 11182276. DOI: 10.3389/fopht.2024.1368081.


References
1.
Krause J, Gulshan V, Rahimy E, Karth P, Widner K, Corrado G . Grader Variability and the Importance of Reference Standards for Evaluating Machine Learning Models for Diabetic Retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2018; 125(8):1264-1272. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.01.034. View

2.
Kang E, Hsieh Y, Li C, Huang Y, Kuo C, Kang J . Deep Learning-Based Detection of Early Renal Function Impairment Using Retinal Fundus Images: Model Development and Validation. JMIR Med Inform. 2020; 8(11):e23472. PMC: 7728538. DOI: 10.2196/23472. View

3.
Ko C, Huang K, Su F, Ko M . Vessel Density in the Macular and Peripapillary Areas in Preperimetric Glaucoma to Various Stages of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma in Taiwan. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(23). PMC: 8658219. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235490. View

4.
Christopher M, Belghith A, Bowd C, Proudfoot J, Goldbaum M, Weinreb R . Performance of Deep Learning Architectures and Transfer Learning for Detecting Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy in Fundus Photographs. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):16685. PMC: 6232132. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-35044-9. View

5.
Samarawickrama C, Mitchell P, Tong L, Gazzard G, Lim L, Wong T . Myopia-related optic disc and retinal changes in adolescent children from singapore. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(10):2050-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.02.040. View