Does Posterior Tibial Slope Influence Knee Kinematics in Medial Stabilized TKA?

Overview

Journal J Clin Med

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2022 Nov 26

PMID 36431352

Authors

Leandra Bauer

Christoph Thorwachter

Arnd Steinbruck

Volkmar Jansson

Hannes Traxler

Zumreta Alic

Boris Michael Holzapfel

Matthias Woiczinski

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: During total knee arthroplasty (TKA), one of the key alignment factors to pay attention to is the posterior tibial slope (PTS). The PTS clearly influences the kinematics of the knee joint but must be adapted to the coupling degree of the specific TKA design. So far, there is hardly any literature including clear recommendations for how surgeons should choose the PTS in a medial stabilized (MS) TKA. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of different degrees of PTS on femorotibial kinematics in MS TKA.

Materials And Methods: An MS TKA was performed in seven fresh-frozen human specimens successively with 0°, 3°, and 6° of PTS. After each modification, weight-bearing deep knee flexion (30-130°) was performed, and femorotibial kinematics were analyzed.

Results: A lateral femoral rollback was observed for all three PTS modifications. With an increasing PTS, the tibia was shifted more anteriorly on the lateral side (0° PTS anterior tibial translation -9.09 (±9.19) mm, 3° PTS anterior tibial translation -11.03 (±6.72) mm, 6° PTS anterior tibial translation 11.86 (±9.35) mm). No difference in the tibial rotation was found for the different PTS variants. All PTS variants resulted in internal rotation of the tibia during flexion. With a 3° PTS, the design-specific medial rotation point was achieved more accurately.

Conclusions: According to our findings, we recommend a PTS of 3° when implanting the MS prosthesis used in this study.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of posterior tibial slope measurements: Accuracy and reliability of radiographs and CT.

Hiyama S, Rao R, Xie F, Takahashi T, Takeshita K, Pandit H J Orthop. 2025; 68:62-67.

PMID: 40007522 PMC: 11850100. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.01.037.

A morphometric study of posterior tibial slope differences by sex and ethnicity in a South African population.

Hohmann E, Nel A, Zyl R, Natalie N, Mogale N Surg Radiol Anat. 2025; 47(1):52.

PMID: 39751943 PMC: 11698820. DOI: 10.1007/s00276-024-03551-2.

ACL reconstruction combined with anterolateral structures reconstruction for treating ACL rupture and knee injuries: a finite element analysis.

Wang H, Yao G, He K, Wang Z, Cheng C Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1437684.

PMID: 39170062 PMC: 11337200. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1437684.

No significant clinical differences between native or reduced posterior tibial slope in kinematically aligned total knee replacement with posterior cruciate-retaining.

Cacciola G, Giustra F, Bosco F, Vezza D, Pirato F, Braconi L J Orthop. 2024; 54:32-37.

PMID: 38524363 PMC: 10957378. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.03.023.

References

Utzschneider S, Goettinger M, Weber P, Horng A, Glaser C, Jansson V . Development and validation of a new method for the radiologic measurement of the tibial slope. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19(10):1643-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1414-3. View

Kim K, Bin S, Kim J . The Correlation between Posterior Tibial Slope and Maximal Angle of Flexion after Total Knee Arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2012; 24(3):158-63. PMC: 3438277. DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.2012.24.3.158. View

Singh G, Tan J, Sng B, Awiszus F, Lohmann C, Nathan S . Restoring the anatomical tibial slope and limb axis may maximise post-operative flexion in posterior-stabilised total knee replacements. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B(10):1354-8. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.31477. View

Steinbruck A, Schroder C, Woiczinski M, Schmidutz F, Muller P, Jansson V . Mediolateral femoral component position in TKA significantly alters patella shift and femoral roll-back. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25(11):3561-3568. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-017-4633-4. View

Steinbruck A, Schroder C, Woiczinski M, Glogaza A, Muller P, Jansson V . A lateral retinacular release during total knee arthroplasty changes femorotibial kinematics: an in vitro study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017; 138(3):401-407. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-017-2843-3. View

Karimi E, Norouzian M, Birjandinejad A, Zandi R, Makhmalbaf H . Measurement of Posterior Tibial Slope Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2018; 5(6):435-439. PMC: 5736893. View

Kang K, Koh Y, Son J, Kwon O, Lee J, Kwon S . Influence of Increased Posterior Tibial Slope in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Knee Joint Biomechanics: A Computational Simulation Study. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 33(2):572-579. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.025. View

Muller O, Lo J, Wunschel M, Obloh C, Wulker N . Simulation of force loaded knee movement in a newly developed in vitro knee simulator. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2009; 54(3):142-9. DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2009.015. View

Steinbruck A, Schroder C, Woiczinski M, Fottner A, Muller P, Jansson V . Patellofemoral contact patterns before and after total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro measurement. Biomed Eng Online. 2013; 12:58. PMC: 3736609. DOI: 10.1186/1475-925X-12-58. View

10.

Banks S, Harman M, Hodge W . Mechanism of anterior impingement damage in total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84-A Suppl 2:37-42. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200200002-00004. View

11.

Schutz P, Taylor W, Postolka B, Fucentese S, Koch P, Freeman M . Kinematic Evaluation of the GMK Sphere Implant During Gait Activities: A Dynamic Videofluoroscopy Study. J Orthop Res. 2019; 37(11):2337-2347. PMC: 6851890. DOI: 10.1002/jor.24416. View

12.

Dorr L, Boiardo R . Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; (205):5-11. View

13.

Fujito T, Tomita T, Yamazaki T, Oda K, Yoshikawa H, Sugamoto K . Influence of Posterior Tibial Slope on Kinematics After Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(12):3778-3782.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.029. View

14.

Freeman M, Pinskerova V . The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech. 2004; 38(2):197-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.02.006. View

15.

Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Mizu-Uchi H, Hamai S, Doi T, Iwamoto Y . Influence of the posterior tibial slope on the flexion gap in total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2014; 21(4):806-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.02.019. View

16.

Grood E, Suntay W . A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng. 1983; 105(2):136-44. DOI: 10.1115/1.3138397. View

17.

Bai B, Baez J, Testa N, Kummer F . Effect of posterior cut angle on tibial component loading. J Arthroplasty. 2000; 15(7):916-20. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2000.9058. View

18.

Kim J . Effect of posterior femoral condylar offset and posterior tibial slope on maximal flexion angle of the knee in posterior cruciate ligament sacrificing total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2013; 25(2):54-9. PMC: 3671116. DOI: 10.5792/ksrr.2013.25.2.54. View

19.

Pinskerova V, Johal P, Nakagawa S, Sosna A, Williams A, Gedroyc W . Does the femur roll-back with flexion?. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86(6):925-31. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.14589. View

20.

Kang K, Koh Y, Son J, Kwon O, Lee J, Kwon S . Biomechanical Effects of Posterior Condylar Offset and Posterior Tibial Slope on Quadriceps Force and Joint Contact Forces in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2017:4908639. PMC: 5733759. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4908639. View