» Articles » PMID: 15598446

The Movement of the Normal Tibio-femoral Joint

Overview
Journal J Biomech
Specialty Physiology
Date 2004 Dec 16
PMID 15598446
Citations 161
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This review describes the anatomy of the articular surfaces and their movement in the normal tibio-femoral joint, together with methods of measurement in volunteers. Forces and soft tissues are excluded. To measure movement, the articular surfaces and natural or inserted movement markers must be imaged by some combination of MRI, CT, RSA or fluoroscopy. With the aid of computer-imaging, the movements can then be related to an anatomy-based co-ordinate system to avoid kinematic cross-talk. Methods of depicting these movements which are understandable to engineers and clinicians are discussed. The shapes of the articular surfaces are reported. They are relevant to landmarks and co-ordinate systems and form a basis for inferring the nature of the movements which take place in the knee. The movements of the condyles are described from hyperextension to full passive flexion. Medially the condyle hardly moves antero-posteriorly from 0 degrees to 120 degrees but the contact area transfers from an anterior pair of tibio-femoral surfaces at 10 degrees to a posterior pair at about 30 degrees . Thus because of the shapes of the bones, the medial contact area moves backwards with flexion to 30 degrees but the condyle does not. Laterally the femoral condyle and the contact area move posteriorly but to a variable extent in the mid-range causing tibial internal rotation to occur with flexion around a medial axis. From 120 degrees to full flexion both condyles roll back onto the posterior horn so that the tibio-femoral joint subluxes.

Citing Articles

Conceptual foundations of a REFRAME-based approach to discriminate across total knee implant designs based on the positions of functional centres of rotation.

Sauer A, Ortigas-Vasquez A, Thorwaechter C, Muller P, Windhagen H, Maas A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):834.

PMID: 39755774 PMC: 11700090. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84522-w.


Medial pivot total knee arthroplasty for valgus knees provides equivalent medial stability compared to that for varus knees: In vivo kinematic study.

Kage T, Kono K, Tomita T, Yamazaki T, Taketomi S, Yamagami R J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(4):e70013.

PMID: 39703832 PMC: 11655669. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70013.


A reproducible representation of healthy tibiofemoral kinematics during stair descent using REFRAME - Part II: Exploring optimisation criteria and inter-subject differences.

Ortigas-Vasquez A, Taylor W, Postolka B, Schutz P, Maas A, Grupp T Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25345.

PMID: 39455805 PMC: 11511945. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-76275-3.


An Analysis of the Use of Anesthetic Blocks versus Local Anesthesia Infiltration in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery.

Gomez Gomez S, Segura Mata J, Alcala Nalvaiz J, Garcia-Alvarez Garcia F, Marin Zaldivar C, Fernandez de Gamarra Goiricelaya A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(19).

PMID: 39407765 PMC: 11476404. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13195706.


kinematic comparison of bi-cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty between mechanical alignment and functional alignment methods.

Kage T, Kono K, Tomita T, Yamazaki T, Taketomi S, Yamagami R Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2024; 38:14-21.

PMID: 39315350 PMC: 11417494. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmart.2024.09.002.