» Articles » PMID: 36426366

Influence of PRRSV-1 Vaccination and Infection on Mononuclear Immune Cells at the Maternal-fetal Interface

Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is one of the most devastating viruses for the global swine industry. Infection during late gestation causes reproductive failure but the local immune response remains poorly understood. In this study, an experimental PRRSV-infection model with two different PRRSV-1 field isolates was used to investigate the immune cell phenotypes at the maternal-fetal interface during late gestation. In addition, phenotypic changes induced by a modified live virus (MLV, ReproCyc PRRS EU) vaccine were studied. Vaccinated (n = 12) and non-vaccinated pregnant gilts (n = 12) were challenged with either one of the PRRSV-1 field isolates (low vs. high virulent, LV or HV) or sham-inoculated at day 84 of gestation. Twenty-one days post infection all gilts were euthanized and the fetal preservation status for all fetuses per litter was assessed. Leukocytes from the maternal-fetal interface were isolated and PRRSV-induced changes were investigated using phenotyping by flow cytometry. PRRSV load in tissue from the maternal endometrium (ME) and fetal placenta (FP) was determined by RT-qPCR. In the ME, a vast increase in CD8β T cells with CD8αCD27 early effector phenotype was found for fetuses from the non-vaccinated LV and HV-challenged gilts, compared to non-treated and vaccinated-only controls. HV-challenged fetuses also showed significant increases of lymphocytes with effector phenotypes in the FP, including NKp46 NK cells, CD8α γδ T cells, as well as CD8αCD27 CD4 and CD8 T cells. In vaccinated animals, this common activation of effector phenotypes was more confined and the fetal preservation status significantly improved. Furthermore, a negative correlation between the viral load and CD163CD169 mononuclear phagocytic cells was observed in the FP of HV-infected animals. These results suggest that the strong expansion of effector lymphocytes in gilts that were only infected causes immune-pathogenesis rather than protection. In contrast, the attenuated MLV seems to dampen this effect, yet presumably induces memory cells that limit reproductive failure. This work provides valuable insights into changes of local immune cell phenotypes following PRRSV vaccination and infection.

Citing Articles

Changes in Immune Response during Pig Gestation with a Focus on Cytokines.

Velez C, Williamson D, Canovas M, Giai L, Rutland C, Perez W Vet Sci. 2024; 11(1).

PMID: 38275932 PMC: 10819333. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci11010050.


Levels of neutralizing antibodies against resident farm strain or vaccine strain are not indicators of protection against PRRSV-1 vertical transmission under farm conditions.

Martin-Valls G, Li Y, Clilverd H, Soto J, Cortey M, Mateu E BMC Vet Res. 2023; 19(1):217.

PMID: 37858141 PMC: 10588270. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-023-03785-z.


Gene expression of peripheral blood mononuclear cells and CD8 T cells from gilts after PRRSV infection.

Lagumdzic E, Pernold C, Ertl R, Palmieri N, Stadler M, Sawyer S Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1159970.

PMID: 37409113 PMC: 10318438. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1159970.


Quantitative Analysis of Inflammatory Uterine Lesions of Pregnant Gilts with Digital Image Analysis Following Experimental PRRSV-1 Infection.

Horvath D, Abonyi-Toth Z, Papp M, Szasz A, Rumenapf T, Knecht C Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(5).

PMID: 36899686 PMC: 10000175. DOI: 10.3390/ani13050830.

References
1.
Osorio F, Galeota J, Nelson E, Brodersen B, Doster A, Wills R . Passive transfer of virus-specific antibodies confers protection against reproductive failure induced by a virulent strain of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and establishes sterilizing immunity. Virology. 2002; 302(1):9-20. DOI: 10.1006/viro.2002.1612. View

2.
Kuhn J, Lauck M, Bailey A, Shchetinin A, Vishnevskaya T, Bao Y . Reorganization and expansion of the nidoviral family Arteriviridae. Arch Virol. 2015; 161(3):755-68. PMC: 5573231. DOI: 10.1007/s00705-015-2672-z. View

3.
Whitworth K, Rowland R, Ewen C, Trible B, Kerrigan M, Cino-Ozuna A . Gene-edited pigs are protected from porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus. Nat Biotechnol. 2015; 34(1):20-2. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3434. View

4.
Karniychuk U, Nauwynck H . Quantitative changes of sialoadhesin and CD163 positive macrophages in the implantation sites and organs of porcine embryos/fetuses during gestation. Placenta. 2009; 30(6):497-500. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.03.016. View

5.
Talker S, Kaser T, Reutner K, Sedlak C, Mair K, Koinig H . Phenotypic maturation of porcine NK- and T-cell subsets. Dev Comp Immunol. 2013; 40(1):51-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.dci.2013.01.003. View