» Articles » PMID: 36423200

Day 5 Versus Day 3 Embryo Biopsy for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic/single Gene Defects

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2022 Nov 24
PMID 36423200
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Assisted reproductive technology (ART) has allowed couples with a family history of a monogenic genetic disease, or a disease-carrying gene, to reduce the chance of them having a child with the genetic disorder. This is achieved by genetically testing the embryos using an advanced process called preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic or single gene disorders (PGT-M), such as Huntington's disease or cystic fibrosis. This current terminology (PGT-M) has replaced the formerly-known preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). During PGT-M, one or more embryo cells are biopsied and analysed for genetic or chromosomal anomalies before transferring the embryos to the endometrial cavity. Biopsy for PGT-M can be performed at day 3 of cleavage-stage embryo development when the embryo is at the six- to the eight-cell stage, with either one or two blastomeres being removed for analysis. Biopsy for PGT-M can also be performed on day 5 of the blastocyst stage of embryo development when the embryo has 80 to 100 cells, with five to six cells being removed for analysis. Day 5 biopsy has taken over from day 3 biopsy as the most widely-used biopsy technique; however, there is a lack of summarised evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assesses the effectiveness and safety of day 5 biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy. Since biopsy is an invasive process, whether it is carried out at day 3 or day 5 of embryo development may have different impacts on further development, implantation, pregnancy, live birth and perinatal outcomes.

Objectives: To assess the benefits and harms of day 5 embryo biopsy, in comparison to day 3 biopsy, in PGT-M in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.

Search Methods: We searched the following electronic bibliographic databases in December 2021 to identify relevant RCTs: the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group (CGFG) Specialised Trials Register; CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycINFO. We also handsearched grey literature, such as trial registers, relevant journals, reference lists, Google Scholar, and published conference abstracts.

Selection Criteria: Eligible RCTs compared day 5 versus day 3 embryo biopsy for PGT-M.  DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. The primary review outcomes were live births and miscarriages. We calculated outcomes per woman/couple randomised and reported odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Main Results: We included one RCT involving 20 women. The evidence was of very low certainty; the main limitations of the study were serious risk of bias due to lack of blinding of study personnel, and imprecision. We are uncertain whether day 5 embryo biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy has an effect on live births (OR 1.50, 95% CI 0.26 to 8.82; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence). The evidence suggests that if the chance of live birth following day 3 biopsy was assumed to be 40%, then the chance with day 5 biopsy is between 15% and 85%. It is also uncertain whether day 5 embryo biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy has an effect on miscarriages (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.05 to 18.57; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence).  We are uncertain whether day 5 embryo biopsy compared to day 3 biopsy has an effect on other secondary outcome measures, including viable intrauterine pregnancies (OR 2.25, 95% CI 0.38 to 13.47; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence), ectopic pregnancies (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.01 to 3.85; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence), stillbirths (OR not estimable as no events in either group; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence) or termination of pregnancies (OR 3.32, 95% CI 0.12 to 91.60; 1 RCT, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence). No studies reported on gestational age at birth, birthweight, neonatal mortality and major congenital anomaly.

Authors' Conclusions: We are uncertain if there is a difference in live births and miscarriages, viable intrauterine pregnancies, ectopic pregnancies, stillbirths or termination of pregnancies between day 5 and day 3 embryo biopsy for PGT-M. There was insufficient evidence to draw any conclusions regarding other adverse outcomes. The results should be interpreted with caution, as the evidence was of very low certainty due to limited studies, high risk of bias in the included study, and an overall low level of precision.

Citing Articles

Evolution of Minimally Invasive and Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing: An Overview.

Moustakli E, Zikopoulos A, Skentou C, Bouba I, Dafopoulos K, Georgiou I J Clin Med. 2024; 13(8).

PMID: 38673433 PMC: 11050362. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082160.


Incidence of complications among fertilization pregnancies.

Tocariu R, Stan D, Mitroi R, Caldararu D, Dinulescu A, Dobre C J Med Life. 2023; 16(3):399-405.

PMID: 37168314 PMC: 10165528. DOI: 10.25122/jml-2023-0048.


Day 5 versus day 3 embryo biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defects.

Vlajkovic T, Grigore M, van Eekelen R, Puscasiu L Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 11:CD013233.

PMID: 36423200 PMC: 9690144. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013233.pub2.

References
1.
Forman E, Li X, Ferry K, Scott K, Treff N, Scott Jr R . Oocyte vitrification does not increase the risk of embryonic aneuploidy or diminish the implantation potential of blastocysts created after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a novel, paired randomized controlled trial using DNA fingerprinting. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98(3):644-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.028. View

2.
Henman M, Catt J, Wood T, Bowman M, de Boer K, Jansen R . Elective transfer of single fresh blastocysts and later transfer of cryostored blastocysts reduces the twin pregnancy rate and can improve the in vitro fertilization live birth rate in younger women. Fertil Steril. 2005; 84(6):1620-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.064. View

3.
De Rycke M, Goossens V, Kokkali G, Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Coonen E, Moutou C . ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XIV-XV: cycles from January 2011 to December 2012 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2013. Hum Reprod. 2017; 32(10):1974-1994. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dex265. View

4.
de Boer K, Catt J, Jansen R, Leigh D, McArthur S . Moving to blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and single embryo transfer at Sydney IVF. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82(2):295-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.11.064. View

5.
Harper J, Coonen E, De Rycke M, Harton G, Moutou C, Pehlivan T . ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection X: cycles from January to December 2007 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2008. Hum Reprod. 2010; 25(11):2685-707. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq228. View