» Articles » PMID: 36418429

Wing Interferential Patterns (WIPs) and Machine Learning, a Step Toward Automatized Tsetse (Glossina Spp.) Identification

Abstract

A simple method for accurately identifying Glossina spp in the field is a challenge to sustain the future elimination of Human African Trypanosomiasis (HAT) as a public health scourge, as well as for the sustainable management of African Animal Trypanosomiasis (AAT). Current methods for Glossina species identification heavily rely on a few well-trained experts. Methodologies that rely on molecular methodologies like DNA barcoding or mass spectrometry protein profiling (MALDI TOFF) haven't been thoroughly investigated for Glossina sp. Nevertheless, because they are destructive, costly, time-consuming, and expensive in infrastructure and materials, they might not be well adapted for the survey of arthropod vectors involved in the transmission of pathogens responsible for Neglected Tropical Diseases, like HAT. This study demonstrates a new type of methodology to classify Glossina species. In conjunction with a deep learning architecture, a database of Wing Interference Patterns (WIPs) representative of the Glossina species involved in the transmission of HAT and AAT was used. This database has 1766 pictures representing 23 Glossina species. This cost-effective methodology, which requires mounting wings on slides and using a commercially available microscope, demonstrates that WIPs are an excellent medium to automatically recognize Glossina species with very high accuracy.

Citing Articles

An annotated wing interferential pattern dataset of dipteran insects of medical interest for deep learning.

Cannet A, Simon-Chane C, Histace A, Akhoundi M, Romain O, Souchaud M Sci Data. 2024; 11(1):4.

PMID: 38168517 PMC: 10761744. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02848-y.


Species identification of phlebotomine sandflies using deep learning and wing interferential pattern (WIP).

Cannet A, Simon-Chane C, Histace A, Akhoundi M, Romain O, Souchaud M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):21389.

PMID: 38049590 PMC: 10696019. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48685-2.


Wing Interferential Patterns (WIPs) and machine learning for the classification of some Aedes species of medical interest.

Cannet A, Simon-Chane C, Histace A, Akhoundi M, Romain O, Souchaud M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):17628.

PMID: 37848666 PMC: 10582169. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44945-3.


Deep learning and wing interferential patterns identify Anopheles species and discriminate amongst Gambiae complex species.

Cannet A, Simon-Chane C, Akhoundi M, Histace A, Romain O, Souchaud M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):13895.

PMID: 37626130 PMC: 10457333. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41114-4.


Detection of Hindwing Landmarks Using Transfer Learning and High-Resolution Networks.

Yang Y, Liu X, Li W, Li C, Ma G, Yang G Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(7).

PMID: 37508435 PMC: 10376506. DOI: 10.3390/biology12071006.

References
1.
Tahir H, Akhtar S . Services of DNA barcoding in different fields. Mitochondrial DNA A DNA Mapp Seq Anal. 2015; 27(6):4463-4474. DOI: 10.3109/19401736.2015.1089572. View

2.
Yssouf A, Parola P, Lindstrom A, Lilja T, LAmbert G, Bondesson U . Identification of European mosquito species by MALDI-TOF MS. Parasitol Res. 2014; 113(6):2375-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00436-014-3876-y. View

3.
Beebe N . DNA barcoding mosquitoes: advice for potential prospectors. Parasitology. 2018; 145(5):622-633. DOI: 10.1017/S0031182018000343. View

4.
De La Rocque S, Geoffroy B, Michel J, Borne F, Solano P, Meunier J . [Tsetse fly wings, an identity card of the insect?]. Parasite. 2002; 9(3):275-81. DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2002093275. View

5.
Kaba D, Berte D, Ta B, Telleria J, Solano P, Dujardin J . The wing venation patterns to identify single tsetse flies. Infect Genet Evol. 2016; 47:132-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2016.10.008. View