Perspectives on the COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake: a Qualitative Study of Community Members and Health Workers in Zambia
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: Since introduction of the programme in April 2021, COVID-19 vaccine uptake has been low at less than 20%. This study explored community members' and health workers' perspectives on the COVID-19 vaccine uptake and its influencing factors in Zambia.
Study Design: A qualitative study employing focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs).
Study Setting: Sixteen primary healthcare facilities selected from Lusaka, Copperbelt, Central and Southern provinces.
Participants: A total of 32 FGDs comprising local community members and 30 IDIs including health workers, traditional, religious and civic leaders (n=272). FGDs were separated based on age (youth and adults), sex (male and female) and place of residence (urban and rural).
Results: Both FGD and IDI participants agreed that vaccine uptake was low. Limited knowledge, access to information, myths and misconceptions, negative attitude, low-risk perception and supply in remote areas affected vaccine uptake. Overall, FGD participants expressed limited knowledge about the COVID-19 vaccine compared with health workers. Further, FGD participants from urban sites were more aware about the vaccine than those from rural areas. Health workers perceived the vaccine to be beneficial; the benefits included prevention of infection and limiting the severity of the disease. Moreover, FGD participants from urban sites expressed a negative attitude towards the vaccine. They believed the vaccine conferred no benefits. By contrast, participants from rural communities had mixed views; they needed more information about the vaccine benefits. Participants' attitude seems to have been influenced by personal or family experience with the COVID-19 disease or vaccination; those who had experienced the disease had a more positive attitude. In contrast, most young people believed they were not at risk of the COVID-19 disease. Misinformation from social media influenced their attitude.
Conclusion: These results provide starting points for future policies and interventions for increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake.
Omale U, Adeke A, Oka O, Ikegwuonu C, Iyare O, Nnachi O Int J Equity Health. 2024; 23(1):223.
PMID: 39468612 PMC: 11520843. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-024-02284-3.
Nair S, Tshabalala K, Slingers N, Vanleeuw L, Basu D, Abdullah F Diseases. 2024; 12(6).
PMID: 38920545 PMC: 11202450. DOI: 10.3390/diseases12060113.
Huebl L, Nnyombi A, Kihumuro A, Lukwago D, Walakira E, Kutalek R PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024; 18(5):e0012173.
PMID: 38739650 PMC: 11115279. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012173.
Mukonka V, Sialubanje C, Matapo B, Chewe O, Ngomah A, Ngosa W BMJ Open. 2023; 13(10):e070796.
PMID: 37798024 PMC: 10565249. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070796.
Sinyange D, Mukumbuta N, Mutale L, Mumbole H, Hamainza B, Sialubanje C BMJ Open. 2023; 13(5):e073287.
PMID: 37236665 PMC: 10231002. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073287.