Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 NCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine Against the B.1.351 Variant
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation of the efficacy of the vaccines against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including the B.1.351 (501Y.V2) variant first identified in South Africa.
Methods: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) in people not infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in South Africa. Participants 18 to less than 65 years of age were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses of vaccine containing 5×10 viral particles or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution) 21 to 35 days apart. Serum samples obtained from 25 participants after the second dose were tested by pseudovirus and live-virus neutralization assays against the original D614G virus and the B.1.351 variant. The primary end points were safety and efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed symptomatic coronavirus 2019 illness (Covid-19) more than 14 days after the second dose.
Results: Between June 24 and November 9, 2020, we enrolled 2026 HIV-negative adults (median age, 30 years); 1010 and 1011 participants received at least one dose of placebo or vaccine, respectively. Both the pseudovirus and the live-virus neutralization assays showed greater resistance to the B.1.351 variant in serum samples obtained from vaccine recipients than in samples from placebo recipients. In the primary end-point analysis, mild-to-moderate Covid-19 developed in 23 of 717 placebo recipients (3.2%) and in 19 of 750 vaccine recipients (2.5%), for an efficacy of 21.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], -49.9 to 59.8). Among the 42 participants with Covid-19, 39 cases (95.1% of 41 with sequencing data) were caused by the B.1.351 variant; vaccine efficacy against this variant, analyzed as a secondary end point, was 10.4% (95% CI, -76.8 to 54.8). The incidence of serious adverse events was balanced between the vaccine and placebo groups.
Conclusions: A two-dose regimen of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine did not show protection against mild-to-moderate Covid-19 due to the B.1.351 variant. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04444674; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACTR202006922165132).
Heng F, Sun Y, Li L, B Gilbert P Stat Med. 2025; 44(6):e10345.
PMID: 40072429 PMC: 11906172. DOI: 10.1002/sim.10345.
Oluka G, Sembera J, Katende J, Ankunda V, Kato L, Kurshan A Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 13(2).
PMID: 40006690 PMC: 11860332. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13020143.
Gobel C, Heinze A, Heinze-Kuhn K, Karstedt S, Morscheck M, Tashiro L Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 13(2).
PMID: 40006661 PMC: 11861871. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13020113.
Galal N, Beshay B, Soliman O, Ismail M, Abdelfadil M, El-Hadidi M PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318712.
PMID: 39970175 PMC: 11838920. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318712.
Population shift in antibody immunity following the emergence of a SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern.
Bhiman J, Madzorera V, Mkhize Q, Scheepers C, Hermanus T, Ayres F Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5549.
PMID: 39953108 PMC: 11828959. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89940-y.