» Articles » PMID: 36380334

Stress in Surgical Educational Environments: a Systematic Review

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2022 Nov 16
PMID 36380334
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The effects of stress on surgical residents and how stress management training can prepare residents to effectively manage stressful situations is a relevant topic. This systematic review aimed to analyze the literature regarding (1) the current stress monitoring tools and their use in surgical environments, (2) the current methods in surgical stress management training, and (3) how stress affects surgical performance.

Methods: A search strategy was implemented to retrieve relevant articles from Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. The 787 initially retrieved articles were reviewed for further evaluation according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria (Prospero registration number CRD42021252682).

Results: Sixty-one articles were included in the review. The stress monitoring methods found in the articles showed heart rate analysis as the most used monitoring tool for physiological parameters while the STAI-6 scale was preferred for psychological parameters. The stress management methods found in the articles were mental-, simulation- and feedback-based training, with the mental-based training showing clear positive effects on participants. The studies analyzing the effects of stress on surgical performance showed both negative and positive effects on technical and non-technical performance.

Conclusions: The impact of stress responses presents an important factor in surgical environments, affecting residents' training and performance. This study identified the main methods used for monitoring stress parameters in surgical educational environments. The applied surgical stress management training methods were diverse and demonstrated positive effects on surgeons' stress levels and performance. There were negative and positive effects of stress on surgical performance, although a collective pattern on their effects was not clear.

Citing Articles

Live Surgery in Orthopedics: Balancing Educational Benefits and Ethical Challenges in the Modern Surgical Practice.

Kale S, Vatkar A, Mishra R, Singh S, Saheta A, Shyam A J Orthop Case Rep. 2024; 14(10):4-9.

PMID: 39381316 PMC: 11458206. DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i10.4790.


Surgeon stress, anxiety, and workload: a descriptive study of participant reported responses to fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery exercises.

Budden A, Henry A, Wakefield C, Abbott J Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(11):6518-6526.

PMID: 39271514 PMC: 11525267. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11238-3.


Applying artificial intelligence on EDA sensor data to predict stress on minimally invasive robotic-assisted surgery.

Caballero D, Perez-Salazar M, Sanchez-Margallo J, Sanchez-Margallo F Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024; 19(10):1953-1963.

PMID: 38955902 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-024-03218-8.


Stress responses in surgical trainees during simulation-based training courses in laparoscopy.

Tjonnas M, Muller S, Vapenstad C, Tjonnas J, Ose S, Das A BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):407.

PMID: 38610013 PMC: 11010405. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05393-3.


Operating under the influence: the effect of alcohol on operative performance using a virtual robotic training platform-an experimental comparative cohort study.

Muensterer O, Apelt N, Schnorpfeil C, Kaufmann T, Goedeke J J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):139.

PMID: 38554196 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01895-w.


References
1.
Thomsen A, Subhi Y, Kiilgaard J, La Cour M, Konge L . Update on simulation-based surgical training and assessment in ophthalmology: a systematic review. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122(6):1111-1130.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.02.028. View

2.
Erestam S, Bock D, Erichsen Andersson A, Haglind E, Park J, Angenete E . The perceived benefit of intraoperative stress modifiers for surgeons: an experimental simulation study in volunteers. Patient Saf Surg. 2021; 15(1):23. PMC: 8164765. DOI: 10.1186/s13037-021-00294-6. View

3.
Stefanidis D, Anton N, Howley L, Bean E, Yurco A, Pimentel M . Effectiveness of a comprehensive mental skills curriculum in enhancing surgical performance: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Surg. 2016; 213(2):318-324. PMC: 5303657. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.10.016. View

4.
van Hove P, Tuijthof G, Verdaasdonk E, Stassen L, Dankelman J . Objective assessment of technical surgical skills. Br J Surg. 2010; 97(7):972-87. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7115. View

5.
Boyanov N, Georgiou K, Thanasas D, Deneva T, Oussi N, Marinov B . Use of saliva stress biomarkers to estimate novice male endoscopist's stress during training in a high-end simulator. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2021; 56(11):1380-1385. DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1965208. View