» Articles » PMID: 38610013

Stress Responses in Surgical Trainees During Simulation-based Training Courses in Laparoscopy

Overview
Journal BMC Med Educ
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2024 Apr 12
PMID 38610013
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Simulation-based training courses in laparoscopy have become a fundamental part of surgical training programs. Surgical skills in laparoscopy are challenging to master, and training in these skills induces stress responses in trainees. There is limited data on trainees' stress levels, the stress responses related to training on different laparoscopic simulators, and how previous experiences influence trainees' stress response during a course. This study investigates physiologic, endocrine and self-reported stress responses during simulation-based surgical skills training in a course setting.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of trainees attending basic laparoscopic skills training courses at a national training centre. During the three-day course, participants trained on different laparoscopic simulators: Two box-trainers (the D-box and P.O.P. trainer) and a virtual reality simulator (LAPMentor™). Participants' stress responses were examined through heart rate variability (HRV), saliva cortisol, and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 (STAI-6). The correlation between previous laparoscopic experiences and stress response measurements was explored.

Results: Twenty-four surgical trainees were included in the study. Compared to resting conditions, stress measures were significantly higher during simulation-training activity (the D-box (SDNN = 58.5 ± 23.4; LF/HF-ratio = 4.58 ± 2.71; STAI-6 = 12.3 ± 3.9, P < 0.05), the P.O.P trainer (SDNN = 55.7 ± 7.4; RMSSD = 32.4 ± 17.1; STAI-6 = 12.1 ± 3.9, P < 0.05), and the LAPMentor™ (SDNN = 59.1 ± 18.5; RMSSD = 34.3 ± 19.7; LF/HF-ratio = 4.71 ± 2.64; STAI-6 = 9.9 ± 3.0, P < 0.05)). A significant difference in endocrine stress response was seen for the simulation-training activity on the D-box (saliva cortisol: 3.48 ± 1.92, P < 0.05), however, no significant differences were observed between the three simulators. A moderate correlation between surgical experience, and physiologic and endocrine stress response was observed (RMSSD: r=-0.31; SDNN: r=-0.42; SD2/SD1 ratio: r = 0.29; Saliva cortisol: r = 0.46; P < 0.05), and a negative moderate correlation to self-reported stress (r=-0.42, P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Trainees have a significant higher stress response during simulation-training compared to resting conditions, with no difference in stress response between the simulators. Significantly higher cortisol levels were observed on the D-box, indicating that simulation tasks with time pressure stress participants the most. Trainees with more surgical experience are associated with higher physiologic stress measures, but lower self-reported stress scores, demonstrating that surgical experience influences trainees' stress response during simulation-based skills training courses.

Citing Articles

Construction of reusable fluorescent assembled 3D-printed hydrogen-based models to simulate minimally invasive resection of complex liver cancer.

Cao W, Pan X, Jin L, Liu J, Cao J, Jin L PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0316199.

PMID: 39729490 PMC: 11676854. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316199.


Effects of Systematically Guided vs. Self-Directed Laparoscopic Box Training on Learning Performances: An Observational Study.

Neubacher M, Darici D, Krawczyk N, Arslan M, Pruss M, Fehm T Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024; 84(12):1135-1142.

PMID: 39649124 PMC: 11624001. DOI: 10.1055/a-2415-5929.


Pilot Evaluation of Silicone Surrogates for Oral Mucosa Simulation in Craniofacial Surgical Training.

Cin M, Koka K, Darragh J, Nourmohammadi Z, Hamdan U, Zopf D Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(8).

PMID: 39194443 PMC: 11351663. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9080464.

References
1.
Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D, Woloshynowych M, Darzi A, Kneebone R . The impact of stress on surgical performance: a systematic review of the literature. Surgery. 2009; 147(3):318-30, 330.e1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.007. View

2.
Bozovic D, Racic M, Ivkovic N . Salivary cortisol levels as a biological marker of stress reaction. Med Arch. 2014; 67(5):374-7. DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2013.67.374-377. View

3.
Hamstra S, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook D . Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Acad Med. 2014; 89(3):387-92. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000130. View

4.
Godoy L, Rossignoli M, Delfino-Pereira P, Garcia-Cairasco N, Umeoka E . A Comprehensive Overview on Stress Neurobiology: Basic Concepts and Clinical Implications. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018; 12:127. PMC: 6043787. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00127. View

5.
Perez-Duarte F, Sanchez-Margallo F, Diaz-Guemes Martin-Portugues I, Sanchez-Hurtado M, Lucas-Hernandez M, Sanchez-Margallo J . Ergonomic analysis of muscle activity in the forearm and back muscles during laparoscopic surgery: influence of previous experience and performed task. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013; 23(2):203-7. DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182827f30. View