» Articles » PMID: 36377847

Patterns of Interdivision Time Correlations Reveal Hidden Cell Cycle Factors

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Nov 15
PMID 36377847
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The time taken for cells to complete a round of cell division is a stochastic process controlled, in part, by intracellular factors. These factors can be inherited across cellular generations which gives rise to, often non-intuitive, correlation patterns in cell cycle timing between cells of different family relationships on lineage trees. Here, we formulate a framework of hidden inherited factors affecting the cell cycle that unifies known cell cycle control models and reveals three distinct interdivision time correlation patterns: aperiodic, alternator, and oscillator. We use Bayesian inference with single-cell datasets of cell division in bacteria, mammalian and cancer cells, to identify the inheritance motifs that underlie these datasets. From our inference, we find that interdivision time correlation patterns do not identify a single cell cycle model but generally admit a broad posterior distribution of possible mechanisms. Despite this unidentifiability, we observe that the inferred patterns reveal interpretable inheritance dynamics and hidden rhythmicity of cell cycle factors. This reveals that cell cycle factors are commonly driven by circadian rhythms, but their period may differ in cancer. Our quantitative analysis thus reveals that correlation patterns are an emergent phenomenon that impact cell proliferation and these patterns may be altered in disease.

Citing Articles

A comprehensive review of computational cell cycle models in guiding cancer treatment strategies.

Ma C, Gurkan-Cavusoglu E NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024; 10(1):71.

PMID: 38969664 PMC: 11226463. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-024-00397-7.


Feedback between stochastic gene networks and population dynamics enables cellular decision-making.

Piho P, Thomas P Sci Adv. 2024; 10(21):eadl4895.

PMID: 38787956 PMC: 11122677. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adl4895.

References
1.
Arora M, Moser J, Phadke H, Basha A, Spencer S . Endogenous Replication Stress in Mother Cells Leads to Quiescence of Daughter Cells. Cell Rep. 2017; 19(7):1351-1364. PMC: 5533606. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.055. View

2.
Errington R, Chappell S, Khan I, Marquez N, Wiltshire M, Griesdoorn V . Time-lapse microscopy approaches to track cell cycle and lineage progression at the single-cell level. Curr Protoc Cytom. 2013; Chapter 12:12.4.1-12.4.13. DOI: 10.1002/0471142956.cy1204s64. View

3.
Dal Co A, Lagomarsino M, Caselle M, Osella M . Stochastic timing in gene expression for simple regulatory strategies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(3):1069-1078. PMC: 5388427. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1235. View

4.
Tomita J, Nakajima M, Kondo T, Iwasaki H . No transcription-translation feedback in circadian rhythm of KaiC phosphorylation. Science. 2004; 307(5707):251-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1102540. View

5.
Raser J, OShea E . Noise in gene expression: origins, consequences, and control. Science. 2005; 309(5743):2010-3. PMC: 1360161. DOI: 10.1126/science.1105891. View