» Articles » PMID: 36377305

Evaluating the Role and Effectiveness of Co-produced Community-based Mental Health Interventions That Aim to Reduce Suicide Among Adults: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Health Expect
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Public Health
Date 2022 Nov 15
PMID 36377305
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Suicide is a major public health risk requiring targeted suicide prevention interventions. The principles of co-production are compatible with tailoring suicide prevention interventions to meet an individual's needs.

Aims: This review aimed to evaluate the role and effectiveness of co-produced community-based suicide prevention interventions among adults.

Methods: Four electronic databases (PsycInfo, CINAHL, MEDLINE and web of science) were systematically searched. A narrative synthesis was conducted.

Results: From 590 papers identified through searches, 14 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most included studies elicited the views and perspectives of stakeholders in a process of co-design/co-creation of community-based suicide prevention interventions.

Conclusion: Stakeholder involvement in the creation of community-based suicide prevention interventions may improve engagement and give voice to those experiencing suicidal crisis. However, there is limited evaluation extending beyond the design of these interventions. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of co-produced community-based suicide prevention interventions.

Patient And Public Involvement: This paper is a systematic review and did not directly involve patients and/or the public. However, the findings incorporate the views and perspectives of stakeholders as reported within the studies included in this review, and the findings may inform the future involvement of stakeholders in the design, development and delivery of community-based suicide prevention interventions for adults.

Citing Articles

Engaging older adults in the process of aging research: a multimethod study evaluating the experience and efficacy of a citizen advisory group for a dementia risk reduction program.

DAmico D, Savundranayagam M, Biles R, Itzhak I, Anderson N Res Involv Engagem. 2024; 10(1):135.

PMID: 39731188 PMC: 11674478. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00643-6.


Government funded suicide prevention in Australia - an environmental scan.

Bassilios B, Currier D, Krysinska K, Dunt D, Machlin A, Newton D BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2315.

PMID: 39187793 PMC: 11348526. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19483-w.


Implementation of caring contacts using patient feedback to reduce suicide-related outcomes following psychiatric hospitalization.

Steinberg R, Amini J, Sinyor M, Mitchell R, Schaffer A Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2024; 54(6):1041-1052.

PMID: 38934489 PMC: 11629600. DOI: 10.1111/sltb.13108.


An Escape Game on University Students' Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cocreation Study.

Labrosse D, Vie C, Hajjam H, Tisseron C, Thellier D, Montagni I JMIR Serious Games. 2024; 12:e48545.

PMID: 38498033 PMC: 10985612. DOI: 10.2196/48545.


A 'Vocal Locals' social network campaign is associated with increased frequency of conversations about mental health and improved engagement in wellbeing-promoting activities in an Australian farming community.

Fletcher C, Woolford D, Gladigau J, Gunn K BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):673.

PMID: 38431599 PMC: 10909292. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18193-7.


References
1.
OConnor R, Portzky G . Looking to the Future: A Synthesis of New Developments and Challenges in Suicide Research and Prevention. Front Psychol. 2018; 9:2139. PMC: 6277491. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02139. View

2.
Bruce M, Pearson J . Designing an intervention to prevent suicide: PROSPECT (Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial). Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2011; 1(2):100-12. PMC: 3181574. View

3.
Greenhalgh T, Jackson C, Shaw S, Janamian T . Achieving Research Impact Through Co-creation in Community-Based Health Services: Literature Review and Case Study. Milbank Q. 2016; 94(2):392-429. PMC: 4911728. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12197. View

4.
Cowdell F, Dyson J, Sykes M, Dam R, Pendleton R . How and how well have older people been engaged in healthcare intervention design, development or delivery using co-methodologies: A scoping review with narrative summary. Health Soc Care Community. 2020; 30(2):776-798. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13199. View

5.
Grindell C, Coates E, Croot L, OCathain A . The use of co-production, co-design and co-creation to mobilise knowledge in the management of health conditions: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):877. PMC: 9264579. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08079-y. View