» Articles » PMID: 36375590

Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Based on Total Keratometry in Patients With Flat and Steep Corneas

Overview
Journal Am J Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2022 Nov 14
PMID 36375590
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the accuracy of the current intraocular lens power calculation formulas using standard keratometry (K) and total keratometry (TK) data in patients with flat and steep corneas.

Design: Retrospective consecutive cross-sectional study.

Methods: An optical biometer with swept-source optical coherence tomography was used in this retrospective study. The standard deviation (SD), mean absolute error (MAE), median absolute error (MedAE), and the proportion of eyes with prediction error (PE) within ±0.25 diopter (D), ±0.5 D, ±0.75 D, and ±1.00 D were calculated to evaluate the refractive outcomes of each formula.

Results: A total of 231 eyes from 231 patients were included. In the entire study cohort, the Emmetropia Verifying Optical (EVO) formula using TK data showed the lowest SD (0.383) and MAE (0.30) and the highest percentage of cases with a PE within ±0.5 D (81.4%). In the flat keratometry group, the EVO (P = .042), Haigis (P = .043), Hoffer Q (P = .038) and Holladay 1 (P = .013) formulas using TK data had significantly lower SD than using K data. The EVO formula using TK data showed the lowest SD (0.357) and MAE (0.28). In the steep keratometry group, the Hoffer Q (P = .036) and SRK/T (P = .029) formulas using TK data had significantly lower SD than using K data. The BUII TK formula showed the lowest SD (0.431), MedAE (0.26), and MAE (0.32).

Conclusion: The TK data set showed a better trend of refractive outcomes, especially in the flat and steep keratometry groups. EVO (TK) and BUII TK formulas were suggested for eyes with K values lower than 42 D and K values higher than 46 D, respectively.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Barrett TK Universal II and Barrett Universal II TCRP Formulas in Power Calculations for 3 Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses.

Li Q, Liu X, Yang J, Dai Y, Li W Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:1457-1465.

PMID: 38818525 PMC: 11137930. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S461195.


Intraocular lens power calculation using total keratometry and ray tracing in eyes with previous small incision lenticule extraction - A case series.

Lischke R, Wiltfang R, Bechmann M, Kreutzer T, Priglinger S, Dirisamer M Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2024; 34:102037.

PMID: 38487335 PMC: 10937105. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2024.102037.


Association of refractive outcome with postoperative anterior chamber depth measured with 3 optical biometers.

Mao Y, Li J, Qin Y, Xu Y, Liu L, Cheng H Int Ophthalmol. 2024; 44(1):62.

PMID: 38345699 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-02995-0.


Effect of Posterior Keratometry on the Accuracy of 10 Intraocular Lens Calculation Formulas: Standard Keratometry versus Total Keratometry.

Jin A, Zhang J, Tan X, Jin K, Zhang Y, Han X Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024; 262(6):1829-1838.

PMID: 38197993 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-023-06367-9.


Deep learning prediction of steep and flat corneal curvature using fundus photography in post-COVID telemedicine era.

Choi J, Kim H, Kim J, Lee I, Ryu I, Kim J Med Biol Eng Comput. 2023; 62(2):449-463.

PMID: 37889431 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-023-02952-6.