» Articles » PMID: 36371851

Feasibility of Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Breast Implants

Overview
Journal Clin Imaging
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Nov 13
PMID 36371851
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) may provide an alternative to magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic exam in women with known or suspected breast cancer or as a screening exam in women at increased risk of breast cancer. Women with breast augmentation, either for oncologic or cosmetic reasons, may fall into this increased risk population and need safe and effective screening and diagnostic imaging tools. Here, we present our clinical practice data in order to demonstrate the feasibility of CEM in women with breast implants. An institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, retrospective review of our tertiary cancer center's database yielded 104 women with breast implants who underwent 198 CEM exams from November 2014 to March 2020. All 198/198 (100%) exams were successfully completed in 104 women. Exam indications included: 174/198 (88%) screening due to increased risk, 10/198 (5%) to evaluate a palpable abnormality, 9/198 (<5%) to evaluate disease extent following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for a known breast malignancy, and 5/198 (<3%) for a 6-month follow-up. 97/104 (93%) women had dense breasts. Routine and implant-displaced low-energy views were obtained with contrast-enhanced images obtained on displaced views for all patients. 197/198 (99.5%) exams yielded no complications. In one exam, the patient experienced mild vasovagal symptoms following the administration of contrast. In conclusion, it is feasible to utilize CEM in both diagnostic and screening capacities in women with breast implants.

Citing Articles

Contrast-enhanced mammography improves patient access to functional breast imaging.

Taylor D, Kessell M, Parizel P J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 69(1):46-61.

PMID: 39482841 PMC: 11834761. DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13789.


Diagnostic Accuracy of Screening Contrast-enhanced Mammography for Women with Extremely Dense Breasts at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.

Nissan N, Comstock C, Sevilimedu V, Gluskin J, Mango V, Hughes M Radiology. 2024; 313(1):e232580.

PMID: 39352285 PMC: 11535862. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.232580.


State-of-the-art for contrast-enhanced mammography.

Covington M, Salmon S, Weaver B, Fajardo L Br J Radiol. 2024; 97(1156):695-704.

PMID: 38374651 PMC: 11027262. DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae017.

References
1.
Sorin V, Yagil Y, Yosepovich A, Shalmon A, Gotlieb M, Halshtok Neiman O . Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018; 211(5):W267-W274. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.17.19355. View

2.
Kam K, Lee E, Pairawan S, Anderson K, Cora C, Bae W . The Effect of Breast Implants on Mammogram Outcomes. Am Surg. 2015; 81(10):1053-6. View

3.
Dromain C, Thibault F, Diekmann F, Fallenberg E, Jong R, Koomen M . Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results of a multireader, multicase study. Breast Cancer Res. 2012; 14(3):R94. PMC: 3446357. DOI: 10.1186/bcr3210. View

4.
Sung J, Lebron L, Keating D, DAlessio D, Comstock C, Lee C . Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer. Radiology. 2019; 293(1):81-88. PMC: 6776233. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019182660. View

5.
Tennant S, James J, Cornford E, Chen Y, Burrell H, Hamilton L . Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography improves diagnostic accuracy in the symptomatic setting. Clin Radiol. 2016; 71(11):1148-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.05.009. View