» Articles » PMID: 30240292

Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Women With Intermediate Breast Cancer Risk and Dense Breasts

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2018 Sep 22
PMID 30240292
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and ultrasound with that of standard digital mammography for breast cancer screening of women at intermediate risk who have dense breasts.

Materials And Methods: In a retrospective cohort of 611 consecutively registered women who underwent screening CESM from 2012 to 2017, BI-RADS scores of the screening modalities were compared with actual disease status, assessed by histopathologic analysis or imaging follow-up. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

Results: Among the 611 women included, 48.3% (295/611) had family or personal history of breast cancer, the BI-RADS breast density score was C or D in 93.1% (569/611). The mean follow-up period was 20 months. Mammography depicted 11 of 21 malignancies, sensitivity of 52.4%, specificity of 90.5% (534/590), positive predictive value of 16.4% (11/67), and negative predictive value of 98.2% (534/544). CESM depicted 19 of 21 malignancies, sensitivity of 90.5%, specificity of 76.1% (449/590), positive predictive value of 11.9% (19/160), and negative predictive value of 99.6% (449/451). Differences in sensitivity (p = 0.008) and specificity (p < 0.001) were statistically significant. Adjunct ultrasound revealed 73 additional suspicious findings; all were false-positive. In 39 women MRI was needed to assess screening abnormalities; two MRI-guided biopsies were performed and yielded one cancer. The incremental cancer detection rate of CESM was 13.1/1000 women (95% CI, 6.1-20.1). Of eight cancers seen only with CESM, seven were invasive (mean size, 9 mm; two of four cancers lymph-node positive).

Conclusion: CESM was significantly more sensitive than standard digital mammography for detecting breast cancer in this screening population. No added benefit was found in the performance of ultrasound as an adjunct to CESM screens with negative results. CESM may be a valuable supplemental screening modality for women at intermediate risk who have dense breasts.

Citing Articles

Screening of breast cancer in higher-risk Taiwanese women using contrast-enhanced mammography.

Chou C, Hong Y, Lin Y, Lin P Heliyon. 2025; 11(2):e41851.

PMID: 39897843 PMC: 11782981. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41851.


Influence of Breast Density and Menopausal Status on Background Parenchymal Enhancement in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: Insights from a Retrospective Analysis.

Nicosia L, Mariano L, Mallardi C, Sorce A, Frassoni S, Bagnardi V Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796642 PMC: 11718959. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010011.


Contrast-Enhanced Mammography: A Literature Review of Clinical Uses for Cancer Diagnosis and Surgical Oncology.

Chung W, Tang Y, Cheung Y Cancers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39766044 PMC: 11674923. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244143.


Contrast Enhancement in Breast Cancer: Magnetic Resonance vs. Mammography: A 10-Year Systematic Review.

Filippone F, Boudagga Z, Frattini F, Fortuna G, Razzini D, Tambasco A Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(21).

PMID: 39518367 PMC: 11545212. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14212400.


Contrast-enhanced mammography improves patient access to functional breast imaging.

Taylor D, Kessell M, Parizel P J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 69(1):46-61.

PMID: 39482841 PMC: 11834761. DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13789.