» Articles » PMID: 36369616

Performance of Manufacturer Cleaning Recommendations Applied to 3D Food Ink Capsules for the Control of a Human Norovirus Surrogate

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2022 Nov 12
PMID 36369616
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With the widespread availability of 3D food printing systems for purchase, users can customize their food in new ways. Manufacturer recommendations for cleaning these machines remain untested with regard to the prevention of foodborne pathogen transmission. This study aimed to determine if manufacturer cleaning recommendations for food ink capsules utilized in 3D food printers are adequate to control human norovirus (HuNoV). A HuNoV surrogate, Tulane virus (TuV; ~ 6 log PFU/mL), was inoculated onto the interior surface of stainless steel food ink capsules. Capsules were either unsoiled or soiled with one of the following: butter, protein powder solution, powdered sugar solution, or a mixture containing all three food components. The capsules were allowed to dry and then one of three hygienic protocols was applied: manual washing (MW), a dishwasher speed cycle (DSC), or a dishwasher heavy cycle (DHC). The interaction effect between DSC and pure butter was a significant predictor of log reduction (P = 0.0067), with the pure butter and DSC combination achieving an estimated mean log reduction of 4.83 (95% CI 4.13, 5.59). The DSC was the least effective method of cleaning when compared with MW and the DHC. The 3-way interaction effects between wash type, soil, and capsule position were a significant predictor of log reduction (P = 0.00341). Capsules with butter in the DSC achieved an estimated mean log reduction of 2.81 (95% CI 2.80, 2.83) for the front-most position versus 6.35 (95% CI 6.33, 6.37) for the back-most position. Soil matrix, cleaning protocol, and capsule position all significantly impact capsule cleanability and potential food safety risk. The DHC is recommended for all capsules, and the corners should be avoided when placing capsules into the dishwasher. The current study seeks to provide recommendations for users of additive manufacturing and 3D food printing including consumers, restaurants, industry, and regulatory industries.

Citing Articles

Towards the development of foods 3D printer: Trends and technologies for foods printing.

Neamah H, Tandio J Heliyon. 2024; 10(13):e33882.

PMID: 39050479 PMC: 11268349. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33882.


Tulane Virus Persistence and Microbial Stability in 3D Food Ink under Various Storage Conditions: A Pre- and Post-Printing Analysis.

Hamilton A, Gibson K Food Environ Virol. 2024; 16(3):351-362.

PMID: 38709390 PMC: 11422428. DOI: 10.1007/s12560-024-09597-0.

References
1.
Arthur S, Gibson K . Physicochemical stability profile of Tulane virus: a human norovirus surrogate. J Appl Microbiol. 2015; 119(3):868-75. DOI: 10.1111/jam.12878. View

2.
Atmar R, Estes M . The epidemiologic and clinical importance of norovirus infection. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2006; 35(2):275-90, viii. DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2006.03.001. View

3.
Bidawid S, Farber J, Sattar S, Hayward S . Heat inactivation of hepatitis A virus in dairy foods. J Food Prot. 2000; 63(4):522-8. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-63.4.522. View

4.
Cromeans T, Park G, Costantini V, Lee D, Wang Q, Farkas T . Comprehensive comparison of cultivable norovirus surrogates in response to different inactivation and disinfection treatments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014; 80(18):5743-51. PMC: 4178592. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01532-14. View

5.
Deboosere N, Legeay O, Caudrelier Y, Lange M . Modelling effect of physical and chemical parameters on heat inactivation kinetics of hepatitis A virus in a fruit model system. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004; 93(1):73-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.10.015. View