» Articles » PMID: 36364910

The Relative Merits of Observational and Experimental Research: Four Key Principles for Optimising Observational Research Designs

Overview
Journal Nutrients
Date 2022 Nov 11
PMID 36364910
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The main barrier to the publication of observational research is a perceived inferiority to randomised designs with regard to the reliability of their conclusions. This commentary addresses this issue and makes a set of recommendations. It analyses the issue of research reliability in detail and fully describes the three sources of research unreliability (certainty, risk and uncertainty). Two of these (certainty and uncertainty) are not adequately addressed in most research texts. It establishes that randomised designs are vulnerable as observation studies to these two sources of unreliability, and are therefore not automatically superior to observational research in all research situations. Two key principles for reducing research unreliability are taken from R.A. Fisher's early work on agricultural research. These principles and their application are described in detail. The principles are then developed into four key principles that observational researchers should follow when they are designing observational research exercises in nutrition. It notes that there is an optimal sample size for any particular research exercise that should not be exceeded. It concludes that best practice in observational research is to replicate this optimal sized observational exercise multiple times in order to establish reliability and credibility.

Citing Articles

Developing Food Consumer Attitudes towards Ionizing Radiation and Genetic Modification.

Junaedi I, McNeill L, Hamlin R Nutrients. 2024; 16(20).

PMID: 39458425 PMC: 11514585. DOI: 10.3390/nu16203427.

References
1.
Hilton Boon M, Burns J, Craig P, Griebler U, Heise T, Katikireddi S . Value and Challenges of Using Observational Studies in Systematic Reviews of Public Health Interventions. Am J Public Health. 2022; 112(4):548-552. PMC: 8961824. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306658. View

2.
Ejima K, Li P, Smith Jr D, Nagy T, Kadish I, van Groen T . Observational research rigour alone does not justify causal inference. Eur J Clin Invest. 2016; 46(12):985-993. PMC: 5118066. DOI: 10.1111/eci.12681. View

3.
van den Berg H . Occam's razor: from Ockham's to modern data science. Sci Prog. 2018; 101(3):261-272. PMC: 10365162. DOI: 10.3184/003685018X15295002645082. View

4.
Anglemyer A, Horvath H, Bero L . Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (4):MR000034. PMC: 8191367. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2. View

5.
Hu Z, Qin J . Generalizability of causal inference in observational studies under retrospective convenience sampling. Stat Med. 2018; . DOI: 10.1002/sim.7808. View