Value and Challenges of Using Observational Studies in Systematic Reviews of Public Health Interventions

Overview

Journal Am J Public Health

Specialty Public Health

Date 2022 Mar 23

PMID 35319925

Authors

Michele Hilton Boon

Jacob Burns

Peter Craig

Ursula Griebler

Thomas L Heise

S Vittal Katikireddi

Eva Rehfuess

Sasha Shepperd

Hilary Thomson

Lisa Bero

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

The evolution and adaptation of evidence synthesis during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: Perspectives of evidence synthesis producers.

Corrin T, Kennedy E PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0314657.

PMID: 39602442 PMC: 11602041. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314657.

A systematic review of animal feeding operations including concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) for exposure, health outcomes, and environmental justice.

Son J, Heo S, Byun G, Foo D, Song Y, Lewis B Environ Res. 2024; 259:119550.

PMID: 38964578 PMC: 11365793. DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119550.

Effectiveness of zygomatic-implant fixed rehabilitation for the atrophic edentulous maxilla: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Rodrigues A, Abi-Nader S, Durand R, Rompre P, Idrissi Janati A, Atsu S Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):146.

PMID: 38822368 PMC: 11140941. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02561-w.

Factors Influencing Tobacco Smoking and Cessation Among People Living with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Hoang T, Nguyen V, Adermark L, Alvarez G, Shelley D, Ng N AIDS Behav. 2024; 28(6):1858-1881.

PMID: 38478323 PMC: 11161546. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-024-04279-1.

Return on investment of workplace-based prevention interventions: a systematic review.

Thonon F, Godon-Rensonnet A, Perozziello A, Garsi J, Dab W, Emsalem P Eur J Public Health. 2023; 33(4):612-618.

PMID: 37290417 PMC: 10393479. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad092.

References

Anglemyer A, Horvath H, Bero L . Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (4):MR000034. PMC: 8191367. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000034.pub2. View

Hernan M . The C-Word: Scientific Euphemisms Do Not Improve Causal Inference From Observational Data. Am J Public Health. 2018; 108(5):616-619. PMC: 5888052. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304337. View

Losilla J, Oliveras I, Marin-Garcia J, Vives J . Three risk of bias tools lead to opposite conclusions in observational research synthesis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 101:61-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.05.021. View

Lopez-Lopez J, Page M, Lipsey M, Higgins J . Dealing with effect size multiplicity in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Res Synth Methods. 2018; 9(3. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1310. View

Hilton Boon M, Craig P, Thomson H, Campbell M, Moore L . Regression Discontinuity Designs in Health: A Systematic Review. Epidemiology. 2020; 32(1):87-93. PMC: 7707156. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001274. View

Hilton Boon M, Thomson H, Shaw B, Akl E, Lhachimi S, Lopez-Alcalde J . Challenges in applying the GRADE approach in public health guidelines and systematic reviews: a concept article from the GRADE Public Health Group. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021; 135:42-53. PMC: 8352629. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.01.001. View

Becker B, Aloe A, Duvendack M, Stanley T, Valentine J, Fretheim A . Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 10: synthesizing evidence for effects collected from quasi-experimental studies presents surmountable challenges. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 89:84-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.014. View

Campbell M, McKenzie J, Sowden A, Katikireddi S, Brennan S, Ellis S . Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020; 368:l6890. PMC: 7190266. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l6890. View

Schunemann H, Cuello C, Akl E, Mustafa R, Meerpohl J, Thayer K . GRADE guidelines: 18. How ROBINS-I and other tools to assess risk of bias in nonrandomized studies should be used to rate the certainty of a body of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018; 111:105-114. PMC: 6692166. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.01.012. View

10.

Marshall I, Wallace B . Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis. Syst Rev. 2019; 8(1):163. PMC: 6621996. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1074-9. View

11.

Lhachimi S, Pega F, Heise T, Fenton C, Gartlehner G, Griebler U . Taxation of the fat content of foods for reducing their consumption and preventing obesity or other adverse health outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020; 9:CD012415. PMC: 9508786. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012415.pub2. View

12.

Page M, Bero L, Kroeger C, Dai Z, McDonald S, Forbes A . Investigation of Risk Of Bias due to Unreported and SelecTively included results in meta-analyses of nutrition research: the ROBUST study protocol. F1000Res. 2020; 8:1760. PMC: 7025772. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.20726.2. View

13.

von Philipsborn P, Stratil J, Burns J, Busert L, Pfadenhauer L, Polus S . Environmental interventions to reduce the consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and their effects on health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 6:CD012292. PMC: 6564085. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012292.pub2. View

14.

Burns J, Boogaard H, Polus S, Pfadenhauer L, Rohwer A, van Erp A . Interventions to reduce ambient particulate matter air pollution and their effect on health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 5:CD010919. PMC: 6526394. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010919.pub2. View

15.

Craig P, Katikireddi S, Leyland A, Popham F . Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research. Annu Rev Public Health. 2017; 38:39-56. PMC: 6485604. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044327. View

16.

Quigley J, Thompson J, Halfpenny N, Scott D . Critical appraisal of nonrandomized studies-A review of recommended and commonly used tools. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018; 25(1):44-52. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12889. View

17.

Schwingshackl L, Balduzzi S, Beyerbach J, Brockelmann N, Werner S, Zahringer J . Evaluating agreement between bodies of evidence from randomised controlled trials and cohort studies in nutrition research: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2021; 374:n1864. PMC: 8441535. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n1864. View

18.

Waddington H, Aloe A, Becker B, Djimeu E, Hombrados J, Tugwell P . Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 6: risk of bias assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 89:43-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.015. View

19.

Reeves B, Wells G, Waddington H . Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 5: a checklist for classifying studies evaluating the effects on health interventions-a taxonomy without labels. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017; 89:30-42. PMC: 5669452. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.016. View

20.

Egger M, Schneider M, Davey Smith G . Spurious precision? Meta-analysis of observational studies. BMJ. 1998; 316(7125):140-4. PMC: 2665367. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.316.7125.140. View