» Articles » PMID: 36359468

A Logistic Regression Model for Biomechanical Risk Classification in Lifting Tasks

Overview
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Nov 11
PMID 36359468
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lifting is one of the most potentially harmful activities for work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), due to exposure to biomechanical risk. Risk assessment for work activities that involve lifting loads can be performed through the NIOSH (National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health) method, and specifically the Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation (RNLE). Aim of this work is to explore the feasibility of a logistic regression model fed with time and frequency domains features extracted from signals acquired through one inertial measurement unit (IMU) to classify risk classes associated with lifting activities according to the RNLE. Furthermore, an attempt was made to evaluate which are the most discriminating features relating to the risk classes, and to understand which inertial signals and which axis were the most representative. In a simplified scenario, where only two RNLE variables were altered during lifting tasks performed by 14 healthy adults, inertial signals (linear acceleration and angular velocity) acquired using one IMU placed on the subject's sternum during repeated rhythmic lifting tasks were automatically segmented to extract several features in the time and frequency domains. The logistic regression model fed with significant features showed good results to discriminate "risk" and "no risk" NIOSH classes with an accuracy, sensitivity and specificity equal to 82.8%, 84.8% and 80.9%, respectively. This preliminary work indicated that a logistic regression model-fed with specific inertial features extracted by signals acquired using a single IMU sensor placed on the sternum-is able to discriminate risk classes according to the RNLE in a simplified context, and therefore could be a valid tool to assess the biomechanical risk in an automatic way also in more complex conditions (e.g., real working scenarios).

Citing Articles

Biomechanical Risk Classification in Repetitive Lifting Using Multi-Sensor Electromyography Data, Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation, and Deep Learning.

Davoudi Kakhki F, Vora H, Moghadam A Biosensors (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 39996986 PMC: 11853325. DOI: 10.3390/bios15020084.


Combining Postural Sway Parameters and Machine Learning to Assess Biomechanical Risk Associated with Load-Lifting Activities.

Prisco G, Pirozzi M, Santone A, Cesarelli M, Esposito F, Gargiulo P Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39795633 PMC: 11720042. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15010105.


Validity of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Prisco G, Pirozzi M, Santone A, Esposito F, Cesarelli M, Amato F Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(1.

PMID: 39795564 PMC: 11719792. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15010036.


Biomarker discovery and development of prognostic prediction model using metabolomic panel in breast cancer patients: a hybrid methodology integrating machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence.

Yagin F, Gormez Y, Al-Hashem F, Ahmad I, Ahmad F, Ardigo L Front Mol Biosci. 2025; 11:1426964.

PMID: 39744676 PMC: 11688212. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2024.1426964.


Capability of Machine Learning Algorithms to Classify Safe and Unsafe Postures during Weight Lifting Tasks Using Inertial Sensors.

Prisco G, Romano M, Esposito F, Cesarelli M, Santone A, Donisi L Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(6).

PMID: 38535000 PMC: 10969570. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14060576.


References
1.
Claudino J, Capanema D, de Souza T, Serrao J, Machado Pereira A, Nassis G . Current Approaches to the Use of Artificial Intelligence for Injury Risk Assessment and Performance Prediction in Team Sports: a Systematic Review. Sports Med Open. 2019; 5(1):28. PMC: 6609928. DOI: 10.1186/s40798-019-0202-3. View

2.
Lim S, DSouza C . A Narrative Review on Contemporary and Emerging Uses of Inertial Sensing in Occupational Ergonomics. Int J Ind Ergon. 2021; 76:102937. PMC: 7985982. View

3.
van Smeden M, Moons K, de Groot J, Collins G, Altman D, Eijkemans M . Sample size for binary logistic prediction models: Beyond events per variable criteria. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018; 28(8):2455-2474. PMC: 6710621. DOI: 10.1177/0962280218784726. View

4.
Winkel J, Mathiassen S . Assessment of physical work load in epidemiologic studies: concepts, issues and operational considerations. Ergonomics. 1994; 37(6):979-88. DOI: 10.1080/00140139408963711. View

5.
Conforti I, Mileti I, Del Prete Z, Palermo E . Measuring Biomechanical Risk in Lifting Load Tasks Through Wearable System and Machine-Learning Approach. Sensors (Basel). 2020; 20(6). PMC: 7146543. DOI: 10.3390/s20061557. View