» Articles » PMID: 36356105

Self-Prioritization Reconsidered: Scrutinizing Three Claims

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2022 Nov 10
PMID 36356105
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Such is the power of self-relevance, it has been argued that even arbitrary stimuli (e.g., shapes, lines, colors) with no prior personal connection are privileged during information processing following their association with the self (i.e., self-prioritization). This prioritization effect, moreover, is deemed to be stimulus driven (i.e., automatic), grounded in perception, and supported by specialized processing operations. Here, however, we scrutinize these claims and challenge this viewpoint. Although self-relevance unquestionably influences information processing, we contend that, at least at present, there is limited evidence to suggest that the prioritization of arbitrary self-related stimuli is compulsory, penetrates perception, and is underpinned by activity in a dedicated neural network. Rather, self-prioritization appears to be a task-dependent product of ordinary cognitive processes.

Citing Articles

A human working memory advantage for social network information.

Andrews J, Grunewald K, Schweizer S Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2036):20241930.

PMID: 39657809 PMC: 11631495. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1930.


The self-relevant spotlight metaphor: Self-relevant targets diminish distractor-response-binding effects.

Pauly M, Schafer S, Wentura D, Frings C Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; .

PMID: 39557812 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02455-x.


Listen to yourself! Prioritization of self-associated and own voice cues.

Kirk N, Cunningham S Br J Psychol. 2024; 116(1):131-148.

PMID: 39361444 PMC: 11724686. DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12741.


Control over self and others' face: exploitation and exploration.

Wen W, Mei J, Aktas H, Chang A, Suzuishi Y, Kasahara S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):15473.

PMID: 38969734 PMC: 11226441. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66316-2.


Effects of perceptual redundancy, conceptual redundancy and self-relatedness on categorical responses.

Patchitt J, Sherman M, Critchley H Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024; 77(11):2165-2179.

PMID: 38389154 PMC: 11529113. DOI: 10.1177/17470218241237729.


References
1.
Sui J, Ohrling E, Humphreys G . Negative mood disrupts self- and reward-biases in perceptual matching. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2016; 69(7):1438-48. PMC: 6029665. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1122069. View

2.
Firestone C, Scholl B . Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for "top-down" effects. Behav Brain Sci. 2015; 39:e229. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X15000965. View

3.
Niedenthal P, Wood A . Does emotion influence visual perception? Depends on how you look at it. Cogn Emot. 2019; 33(1):77-84. DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1561424. View

4.
Schafer S, Frings C . Searching for the inner self: evidence against a direct dependence of the self-prioritization effect on the ventro-medial prefrontal cortex. Exp Brain Res. 2018; 237(1):247-256. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5413-1. View

5.
Dixon M, de la Vega A, Mills C, Andrews-Hanna J, Nathan Spreng R, Cole M . Heterogeneity within the frontoparietal control network and its relationship to the default and dorsal attention networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(7):E1598-E1607. PMC: 5816169. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715766115. View