» Articles » PMID: 36353505

Individual Fixation Tendencies in Person Viewing Generalize from Images to Videos

Overview
Journal Iperception
Date 2022 Nov 10
PMID 36353505
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fixation behavior toward persons in static scenes varies considerably between individuals. However, it is unclear whether these differences generalize to dynamic stimuli. Here, we examined individual differences in the distribution of gaze across seven person features (i.e. body and face parts) in static and dynamic scenes. Forty-four participants freely viewed 700 complex static scenes followed by eight director-cut videos (28,925 frames). We determined the presence of person features using hand-delineated pixel masks (images) and Deep Neural Networks (videos). Results replicated highly consistent individual differences in fixation tendencies for all person features in static scenes and revealed that these tendencies generalize to videos. Individual fixation behavior for both, images and videos, fell into two anticorrelated clusters representing the tendency to fixate faces versus bodies. These results corroborate a low-dimensional space for individual gaze biases toward persons and show they generalize from images to videos.

Citing Articles

Individual gaze shapes diverging neural representations.

Borovska P, de Haas B Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(36):e2405602121.

PMID: 39213176 PMC: 11388360. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2405602121.


Individual differences in face salience and rapid face saccades.

Broda M, Borovska P, de Haas B J Vis. 2024; 24(6):16.

PMID: 38913016 PMC: 11204136. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.6.16.


Individual differences in human gaze behavior generalize from faces to objects.

Broda M, de Haas B Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(12):e2322149121.

PMID: 38470925 PMC: 10963009. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2322149121.


A preference to look closer to the eyes is associated with a position-invariant face neural code.

Chakravarthula P, Eckstein M Psychon Bull Rev. 2023; 31(3):1268-1279.

PMID: 37930609 PMC: 11192658. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02412-0.


Objects guide human gaze behavior in dynamic real-world scenes.

Roth N, Rolfs M, Hellwich O, Obermayer K PLoS Comput Biol. 2023; 19(10):e1011512.

PMID: 37883331 PMC: 10602265. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011512.


References
1.
Tanaka J, Sung A . The "Eye Avoidance" Hypothesis of Autism Face Processing. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013; 46(5):1538-52. PMC: 3997654. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-013-1976-7. View

2.
Foulsham T, Cheng J, Tracy J, Henrich J, Kingstone A . Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: effects of social status and speaking. Cognition. 2010; 117(3):319-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.003. View

3.
Cerf M, Frady E, Koch C . Faces and text attract gaze independent of the task: Experimental data and computer model. J Vis. 2010; 9(12):10.1-15. DOI: 10.1167/9.12.10. View

4.
Rubo M, Gamer M . Social content and emotional valence modulate gaze fixations in dynamic scenes. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):3804. PMC: 5830578. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-22127-w. View

5.
de Haas B, Iakovidis A, Schwarzkopf D, Gegenfurtner K . Individual differences in visual salience vary along semantic dimensions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019; 116(24):11687-11692. PMC: 6576124. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1820553116. View