» Articles » PMID: 36333903

Comparative Effectiveness Study of Flipped Classroom Versus Online-only Instruction of Clinical Reasoning for Medical Students

Overview
Journal Med Educ Online
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2022 Nov 5
PMID 36333903
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Context: Bedside clinical teaching is the backbone of clerkship education. Data-driven methods for supplementing bedside encounters with standardized content from vetted resources are needed.

Objective: To compare a flipped-classroom versus an interactive online-only instruction for improving knowledge, skills, self-directed learning (SDL) behaviors, and satisfaction in a medical school clerkship.

Methods: An IRB-approved prospective study employing a peer-reviewed clinical reasoning curriculum in neurology was conducted; 2nd-4th year medical students rotating through a required clerkship were enrolled. Students were randomized to flipped-classroom (i.e., ) or interactive asynchronous online instruction (i.e., ), which supplemented existing bedside teaching. Baseline and end-of-course knowledge, skill development, SDL behaviors, satisfaction, and long-term retention were assessed by peer-reviewed clinical reasoning exam, NBME scores, faculty/resident clinical evaluations, non-compulsory assignment completion, end-of-clerkship surveys, and objective structured clinical exam (OSCE).

Results: 104 students (49 , 55 ) were enrolled. Age, gender, and training level did not differ by group (all p > 0.43); baseline knowledge was higher in the group (p = 0.003). Knowledge-based exam scores did not differ by group even after adjusting for differences in baseline knowledge (2.3-points higher in group, 95%CI -0.4-4.8, p = 0.07). Clinical skills were significantly higher in the group, including examination skills (4.2 ± 0.5 vs. 3.9 ± 0.7, p = 0.03) and future housestaff potential (4.8 ± 0.3 vs 4.5 ± 0.6, p = 0.03). Students in the group were more likely to engage in SDL (42 vs. 12%, p = 0.001) and reported more hours studying (6.1 vs. 3.8 hours, p = 0.03). Satisfaction (p = 0.51) and OSCE scores (p = 0.28) were not different by group.

Conclusions: In this comparative study of two evidence-based curricular delivery approaches, we observed no difference in knowledge acquired. Greater clinical skills were observed with instruction, while more SDL was observed with instruction. Supplementing bedside teaching with blended instruction that balances live skill development with vetted online resources is optimal for clerkship education.

Citing Articles

Long-term Outcomes of Geriatric Medicine Teaching Strategies: Comparing no Content, Traditional Lecture, and Flipped Classroom 2 Years Postintervention.

Lucchetti A, Lucchetti G Med Sci Educ. 2025; 34(6):1381-1389.

PMID: 39758500 PMC: 11698694. DOI: 10.1007/s40670-024-02118-5.


Education Research: The Development and Utilization of a Virtual Twitter Onboarding Curriculum for Neurologists, Trainees, and Students: A Prospective Study.

Zelikovich A, Safdieh J, Robbins M Neurol Educ. 2024; 2(3):e200082.

PMID: 39359706 PMC: 11419307. DOI: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200082.


Education Research: Evaluating Medical Student Learning Preference and Its Relationship to Clerkship Satisfaction.

Peyton M, Lea A, Strowd 3rd R, Salas R, Gamaldo C, Leung D Neurol Educ. 2024; 2(4):e200102.

PMID: 39359317 PMC: 11446163. DOI: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200102.


Student satisfaction: Examining capacity development and environmental factors in higher education institutions.

De-Juan-Vigaray M, Ledesma-Chaves P, Gonzalez-Gascon E, Gil-Cordero E Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e36699.

PMID: 39281635 PMC: 11402129. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36699.


Fostering clinical reasoning ability in preclinical students through an illness script worksheet approach in flipped learning: a quasi-experimental study.

Si J BMC Med Educ. 2024; 24(1):658.

PMID: 38872172 PMC: 11177456. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05614-9.


References
1.
Lipman A, Sade R, Glotzbach A, Lancaster C, Marshall M . The incremental value of internet-based instruction as an adjunct to classroom instruction: a prospective randomized study. Acad Med. 2001; 76(10):1060-4. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200110000-00018. View

2.
Hew K, Lo C . Flipped classroom improves student learning in health professions education: a meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2018; 18(1):38. PMC: 5855972. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1144-z. View

3.
Arocha J, Wang D, Patel V . Identifying reasoning strategies in medical decision making: a methodological guide. J Biomed Inform. 2005; 38(2):154-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2005.02.001. View

4.
Pei L, Wu H . Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Educ Online. 2019; 24(1):1666538. PMC: 6758693. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2019.1666538. View

5.
Rajab M, Gazal A, Alkattan K . Challenges to Online Medical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Cureus. 2020; 12(7):e8966. PMC: 7398724. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.8966. View