» Articles » PMID: 36333758

Dynamic Analysis of Iris Changes and a Deep Learning System for Automated Angle-closure Classification Based on AS-OCT Videos

Overview
Journal Eye Vis (Lond)
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2022 Nov 5
PMID 36333758
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To study the association between dynamic iris change and primary angle-closure disease (PACD) with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) videos and develop an automated deep learning system for angle-closure screening as well as validate its performance.

Methods: A total of 369 AS-OCT videos (19,940 frames)-159 angle-closure subjects and 210 normal controls (two datasets using different AS-OCT capturing devices)-were included. The correlation between iris changes (pupil constriction) and PACD was analyzed based on dynamic clinical parameters (pupil diameter) under the guidance of a senior ophthalmologist. A temporal network was then developed to learn discriminative temporal features from the videos. The datasets were randomly split into training, and test sets and fivefold stratified cross-validation were used to evaluate the performance.

Results: For dynamic clinical parameter evaluation, the mean velocity of pupil constriction (VPC) was significantly lower in angle-closure eyes (0.470 mm/s) than in normal eyes (0.571 mm/s) (P < 0.001), as was the acceleration of pupil constriction (APC, 3.512 mm/s vs. 5.256 mm/s; P < 0.001). For our temporal network, the areas under the curve of the system using AS-OCT images, original AS-OCT videos, and aligned AS-OCT videos were 0.766 (95% CI: 0.610-0.923) vs. 0.820 (95% CI: 0.680-0.961) vs. 0.905 (95% CI: 0.802-1.000) (for Casia dataset) and 0.767 (95% CI: 0.620-0.914) vs. 0.837 (95% CI: 0.713-0.961) vs. 0.919 (95% CI: 0.831-1.000) (for Zeiss dataset).

Conclusions: The results showed, comparatively, that the iris of angle-closure eyes stretches less in response to illumination than in normal eyes. Furthermore, the dynamic feature of iris motion could assist in angle-closure classification.

Citing Articles

Artificial intelligence and big data integration in anterior segment imaging for glaucoma.

Chansangpetch S, Ittarat M, Cheungpasitporn W, Lin S Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2024; 14(3):319-332.

PMID: 39430364 PMC: 11488806. DOI: 10.4103/tjo.TJO-D-24-00053.


The Structural Layers of the Porcine Iris Exhibit Inherently Different Biomechanical Properties.

Tan R, Panda S, Braeu F, Muralidharan A, Nongpiur M, Chan A Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(13):11.

PMID: 37796489 PMC: 10561784. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.13.11.


The application of artificial intelligence in glaucoma diagnosis and prediction.

Zhang L, Tang L, Xia M, Cao G Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 11:1173094.

PMID: 37215077 PMC: 10192631. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1173094.

References
1.
Zhang Y, Hedo R, Rivera A, Rull R, Richardson S, Tu X . Post hoc power analysis: is it an informative and meaningful analysis?. Gen Psychiatr. 2019; 32(4):e100069. PMC: 6738696. DOI: 10.1136/gpsych-2019-100069. View

2.
Quigley H . The iris is a sponge: a cause of angle closure. Ophthalmology. 2010; 117(1):1-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.11.002. View

3.
Su D, Friedman D, See J, Chew P, Chan Y, Nolan W . Degree of angle closure and extent of peripheral anterior synechiae: an anterior segment OCT study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007; 92(1):103-7. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2007.122572. View

4.
Zheng C, Xie X, Huang L, Chen B, Yang J, Lu J . Detecting glaucoma based on spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer: a comparison study between hand-crafted features and deep learning model. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019; 258(3):577-585. DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04543-4. View

5.
Zhang Y, Li S, Li L, He M, Thomas R, Wang N . Dynamic Iris Changes as a Risk Factor in Primary Angle Closure Disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57(1):218-26. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-17651. View