Novel Association of Smaller Anterior Chamber Width with Angle Closure in Singaporeans
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: To describe variations in anterior chamber width (ACW) and investigate its association with the presence of narrow angles.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Participants: We recruited 2047 subjects aged 50 years or more from a community polyclinic and 111 subjects with primary angle closure (PAC) or primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) from an eye hospital in Singapore.
Methods: All participants underwent gonioscopy, anterior chamber depth (ACD) and axial length (AL) measurement (IOLMaster; Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany), and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT, Visante, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA). Customized software was used to measure the ACW, defined as the distance between the scleral spurs in the horizontal (nasal-temporal) axis of AS-OCT scans. An eye was deemed to have narrow angles if the posterior trabecular meshwork was not visible for at least 180 degrees on non-indentation gonioscopy with the eye in the primary position.
Main Outcome Measures: Anterior chamber width and narrow angles.
Results: Data on 1465 community-based subjects were available for analysis. Anterior chamber width was significantly smaller in women compared with men (11.70 mm vs. 11.81 mm, respectively, P<0.001) and decreased significantly with age (P for trend <0.001). Significant predictors of smaller ACW were lower educational level, lower body mass index, shorter AL, shallower ACD, and Chinese race. Of the 1465 subjects, 315 (21.5%) had narrow angles on gonioscopy. Mean ACW was smaller in eyes with narrow angles compared with those without narrow angles (11.60 mm vs. 11.80 mm, P<0.001). The age- and gender-adjusted odds ratio for the highest quartile compared with the lower 3 quartiles of ACW with the presence of narrow angles was 3.4 (95% confidence interval, 2.3-5.0; P for trend <0.001). Hospital-based subjects with PAC/PACG had even smaller ACW than community subjects with narrow angles (11.33 mm vs. 11.60 mm, P<0.001).
Conclusions: In this cross-sectional study, ACW was smaller in women, Chinese persons, and older persons, and was associated with narrow angles in 2 different study populations. These data suggest that a smaller ACW may represent a novel risk indicator for angle closure.
Umapathi R, Yu M, Cheng C, Najjar R, Husain R, Ho C Eye (Lond). 2025; .
PMID: 39920346 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03597-5.
Huang Y, Gong D, Dang K, Zhu L, Guo J, Yang W PeerJ. 2024; 12:e18611.
PMID: 39619196 PMC: 11608565. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18611.
Analysis of anterior segment in primary angle closure suspect with deep learning models.
Fu Z, Xi J, Ji Z, Zhang R, Wang J, Shi R BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):251.
PMID: 39251987 PMC: 11385134. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02658-1.
The Beijing angle closure progression study: design and methodology.
Liang Z, Yang K, Lv K, Ma Y, Sun C, Liang G Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1385060.
PMID: 39086940 PMC: 11288979. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1385060.
Advances in swept-source optical coherence tomography and optical coherence tomography angiography.
Zheng F, Deng X, Zhang Q, He J, Ye P, Liu S Adv Ophthalmol Pract Res. 2023; 3(2):67-79.
PMID: 37846376 PMC: 10577875. DOI: 10.1016/j.aopr.2022.10.005.