» Articles » PMID: 36333750

Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Brief Scale to Measure EHealth Literacy in People with Type 2 Diabetes

Overview
Journal BMC Nurs
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2022 Nov 5
PMID 36333750
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The internet has become a major source of health information, and obtaining appropriate information requires various abilities and skills, labeled as electronic health literacy (eHealth literacy). The existing instruments for measuring eHealth literacy are outdated because they were developed during the Web 1.0 era, or not sufficiently sensitive for people with a specific condition or disease because they were designed to assess eHealth literacy over a broad range for a general population. Approximately one in ten adults worldwide live with diabetes. Health professionals have a responsibility to identify patients with low eHealth literacy to prevent them from obtaining misleading internet diabetes information.

Aims: The aims were to develop a condition-specific eHealth literacy scale for diabetes and to evaluate its psychometric properties among people with type 2 diabetes.

Methods: An instrument development design was used. This study recruited 453 people diagnosed with type 2 diabetes at the outpatient clinics of hospitals in 2021. Psychometric properties (internal consistency, measurement invariance, and content, structural, convergent, and known-groups validities) were analyzed.

Results: An expert panel assessed content validity. Exploratory factor analysis, exploratory graph analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for structural validity yielded a two-factor solution (CFI = 0.977, SRMR = 0.029, RMSEA = 0.077). Cronbach's alpha and omega values were excellent for each factor (0.87-0.94). Multigroup CFA yielded configural and metric measurement invariance across the gender, age, and glycemic control status groups. Convergent validity with a comparator instrument to measure health literacy was supported by a moderate correlation, and known-groups validity determined using groups with different internet-use frequencies was satisfied with a high effect size.

Conclusion: A new condition-specific eHealth literacy scale for people with type 2 diabetes was developed, comprising 10 items. The scale exhibited good psychometric properties; however, test-retest reliability must be determined for the stability of the scale and cross-cultural validity is required among different languages. The brief scale has the merits of being feasible to use in busy clinical practice and being less burdensome to respondents. The scale can be applied in clinical trials of internet-based diabetes interventions for assessing the eHealth literacy of respondents.

Citing Articles

Measuring electronic health literacy in the context of diabetes care: psychometric evaluation of a Persian version of the condition-specific eHealth literacy scale for diabetes.

Peimani M, Tanhapour M, Bandarian F, Nasli-Esfahani E, Ostovar A BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):189.

PMID: 38970044 PMC: 11225123. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02594-0.


The Development and Psychometric Testing of the Scale of Cultural Sensitivity of Health Care Professionals in Japan.

Tanaka H, Arakida M J Transcult Nurs. 2023; 35(2):161-176.

PMID: 38158785 PMC: 11017693. DOI: 10.1177/10436596231217688.


Professionals Evaluating Clients' Suitability for Digital Health and Social Care: Scoping Review of Assessment Instruments.

Kaihlanen A, Virtanen L, Kainiemi E, Heponiemi T J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e51450.

PMID: 38032707 PMC: 10722370. DOI: 10.2196/51450.


Childhood environmental harshness and unpredictability negatively predict eHealth literacy through fast life-history strategy.

Feng W, Zhang J Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1197189.

PMID: 37663344 PMC: 10473102. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1197189.

References
1.
Wangdahl J, Jaensson M, Dahlberg K, Nilsson U . The Swedish Version of the Electronic Health Literacy Scale: Prospective Psychometric Evaluation Study Including Thresholds Levels. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(2):e16316. PMC: 7063530. DOI: 10.2196/16316. View

2.
Del Giudice P, Bravo G, Poletto M, De Odorico A, Conte A, Brunelli L . Correlation Between eHealth Literacy and Health Literacy Using the eHealth Literacy Scale and Real-Life Experiences in the Health Sector as a Proxy Measure of Functional Health Literacy: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(10):e281. PMC: 6246968. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9401. View

3.
Kayser L, Kushniruk A, Osborne R, Norgaard O, Turner P . Enhancing the Effectiveness of Consumer-Focused Health Information Technology Systems Through eHealth Literacy: A Framework for Understanding Users' Needs. JMIR Hum Factors. 2016; 2(1):e9. PMC: 4797661. DOI: 10.2196/humanfactors.3696. View

4.
Griebel L, Enwald H, Gilstad H, Pohl A, Moreland J, Sedlmayr M . eHealth literacy research-Quo vadis?. Inform Health Soc Care. 2017; 43(4):427-442. DOI: 10.1080/17538157.2017.1364247. View

5.
Wong D, Cheung M . Online Health Information Seeking and eHealth Literacy Among Patients Attending a Primary Care Clinic in Hong Kong: A Cross-Sectional Survey. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21(3):e10831. PMC: 6456826. DOI: 10.2196/10831. View