» Articles » PMID: 25783223

Testing Reliability and Validity of the EHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS) for Older Adults Recruited Online

Overview
Date 2015 Mar 19
PMID 25783223
Citations 89
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Currently, vast amounts of health information and health management tools are available to the public online. To maximize the benefits of these e-health technologies, it is important to assess the e-health literacy of individuals. The eHealth Literacy Scale has been used widely in the past several years, but mainly in younger populations. The purpose of this study was to test the psychometric aspects of the eHealth Literacy Scale for older adults using a secondary data analysis (N=866; mean age, 62.8±8.5 years). Reliability of the eHealth Literacy Scale was examined by calculating α coefficients and conducting test-retest procedures. Its validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis and the hypothesis testing procedure. Findings demonstrated that eHealth Literacy Scale was internally consistent (α=.94) and stable (t244=-1.48, P=.140). The exploratory factor analysis yielded a single factor structure explaining 67.3% of the variance. The hypothesis testing also supported the validity of eHealth Literacy Scale. In recent years, there have been great efforts to use e-health interventions to engage patients in healthcare and to help them manage their own health. Our study suggests that the eHealth Literacy Scale, a short screening tool for e-health literacy, can be successfully used for older adults.

Citing Articles

Psychometric Analysis of the eHealth Literacy Scale in Portuguese Older Adults (eHEALS-PT24): Instrument Development and Validation.

Luz S, Nogueira P, Costa A, Henriques A J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e57730.

PMID: 40009846 PMC: 11904376. DOI: 10.2196/57730.


Examining internet use for health information seeking and influencing factors among undergraduate health science students in Southwest Ethiopia.

Chereka A, Butta F, Demsash A, Kassie S, Shibabaw A, Dubale A Heliyon. 2025; 11(1):e41545.

PMID: 39845004 PMC: 11750529. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41545.


Health literacy in pediatric thrombosis: a landscape analysis.

Bastas D, Mancini A, Wong G, Brandao L, Mukaj S, Vincelli J Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025; 9(1):102653.

PMID: 39830972 PMC: 11741949. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102653.


Improving weight loss and cardiometabolic risk in black patients with diabetes or pre-diabetes: Rationale and protocol for a digital medicine hybrid type 1 implementation trial.

Katzmarzyk P, Price-Haywood E, Apolzan J, Denstel K, Drews K, Farris E Contemp Clin Trials. 2025; 149:107806.

PMID: 39756673 PMC: 11788030. DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107806.


An integrative systematic review on interventions to improve layperson's ability to identify trustworthy digital health information.

Mohamed H, Kittle E, Nour N, Hamed R, Feeney K, Salsberg J PLOS Digit Health. 2024; 3(10):e0000638.

PMID: 39453891 PMC: 11508166. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000638.


References
1.
Mitsutake S, Shibata A, Ishii K, Okazaki K, Oka K . [Developing Japanese version of the eHealth Literacy Scale (eHEALS)]. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2011; 58(5):361-71. View

2.
Davis T, Long S, Jackson R, Mayeaux E, George R, Murphy P . Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument. Fam Med. 1993; 25(6):391-5. View

3.
Norman C, Skinner H . eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. J Med Internet Res. 2006; 8(2):e9. PMC: 1550701. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9. View

4.
Berkman N, Sheridan S, Donahue K, Halpern D, Crotty K . Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 155(2):97-107. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-2-201107190-00005. View

5.
Rao S, Brammer C, McKethan A, Buntin M . Health information technology: transforming chronic disease management and care transitions. Prim Care. 2012; 39(2):327-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.pop.2012.03.006. View