» Articles » PMID: 36330299

Kin Selection Theory and the Design of Cooperative Crops

Overview
Journal Evol Appl
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Nov 4
PMID 36330299
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In agriculture and plant breeding, plant traits may be favoured because they benefit neighbouring plants and ultimately increase total crop yield. This idea of promoting cooperation among crop plants has existed almost as long as W.D. Hamilton's inclusive fitness (kin selection) theory, the leading framework for explaining cooperation in biology. However, kin selection thinking has not been adequately applied to the idea of cooperative crops. Here, I give an overview of modern kin selection theory and consider how it explains three key strategies for designing cooperative crops: (1) selection for a less-competitive plant type (a 'communal ideotype'); (2) group-level selection for yield; and (3) exploiting naturally selected cooperation. The first two strategies, using artificial selection, have been successful in the past but suffer from limitations that could hinder future progress. Instead, I propose an alternative strategy and a new 'colonial ideotype' that exploits past natural selection for cooperation among the modules (e.g., branches or stems) of individual plants. More generally, I suggest that Hamiltonian agriculture-a kin selection view of agriculture and plant breeding-transforms our understanding of how to improve crops of the future.

Citing Articles

Uncovering the genetic basis of competitiveness and the potential for cooperation in plant groups.

Biernaskie J, Garzon-Martinez G, Corke F, Doonan J Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2042):20241984.

PMID: 40068823 PMC: 11896697. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1984.


The evolution of signaling and monitoring in plant-fungal networks.

Scott T, Kiers E, West S Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(4):e2420701122.

PMID: 39835901 PMC: 7617349. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2420701122.


The causal arrows from genotype, environment, and management to plant phenotype are double headed.

Sadras V, Hayman P J Exp Bot. 2024; 76(4):917-930.

PMID: 39545971 PMC: 11850972. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erae455.


Kin and Non-Kin Connected Plants Benefit More Than Disconnected Kin and Non-Kin Plants under Nutrient-Competitive Environments.

Sher J, Bibi F, Jan G, Tomlinson K, Ayaz A, Zaman W Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(3).

PMID: 36771572 PMC: 9920217. DOI: 10.3390/plants12030487.


Increasing plant group productivity through latent genetic variation for cooperation.

Wuest S, Pires N, Luo S, Vasseur F, Messier J, Grossniklaus U PLoS Biol. 2022; 20(11):e3001842.

PMID: 36445870 PMC: 9707777. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001842.


References
1.
Gardner A . The genetical theory of multilevel selection. J Evol Biol. 2014; 28(2):305-19. PMC: 4415573. DOI: 10.1111/jeb.12566. View

2.
West S, Griffin A, Gardner A . Social semantics: altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. J Evol Biol. 2007; 20(2):415-32. DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01258.x. View

3.
Moore A, Brodie 3rd E, Wolf J . INTERACTING PHENOTYPES AND THE EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS: I. DIRECT AND INDIRECT GENETIC EFFECTS OF SOCIAL INTERACTIONS. Evolution. 2017; 51(5):1352-1362. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01458.x. View

4.
Frank S . Multivariate analysis of correlated selection and kin selection, with an ESS maximization method. J Theor Biol. 1998; 189(3):307-16. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1997.0516. View

5.
Jennings P, de Jesus Jr J . STUDIES ON COMPETITION IN RICE I. COMPETITION IN MIXTURES OF VARIETIES. Evolution. 2017; 22(1):119-124. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1968.tb03455.x. View