» Articles » PMID: 36319740

Microdamage Analysis of Single-use Flexible Ureteroscope Immediately After Lithotripsy Use

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Nov 2
PMID 36319740
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This prospective ex vivo study investigated microdamage to single-use flexible ureteroscopes (fURS) after ureteroscopy and endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS). The performance of 30 WiScope devices (OTU Medical, San Jose, CA, USA) was examined immediately after use, dividing them into three equal groups: ureteroscopy and ECIRS in the prone and supine positions. The overall scope of microdamage assessment included the scope deflection, bending radius, resolution, and water flow rate. Additionally, we analyzed the association between scope status and surgical parameters. The deflection, bending radius, and resolution remained similarly above the thresholds in all groups. However, the water flow rate was below the threshold in seven scopes (70%) in the ureteroscopy group and none in the ECIRS groups (P = 0.001). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses demonstrated that basket wire catheter use was associated with an increased risk for overall scope microdamage (odds ratio [OR], 22.70; P = 0.006 and OR, 22.40; P = 0.019, respectively). Stone size, total laser energy, and surgical position were not associated with a risk for scope microdamage. In conclusion, ureteroscopy was more closely associated with scope damage than ECIRS, and basket wire catheter use seemed to inflict more damage to the fURS.

Citing Articles

Single use flexible ureteroscopes: Current status and future directions.

Juliebo-Jones P, Ventimiglia E, Somani B, Asoy M, Gjengsto P, Beisland C BJUI Compass. 2023; 4(6):613-621.

PMID: 37818020 PMC: 10560621. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.265.

References
1.
Abbott J, Sur R . Ureterorenoscopy: current technology and future outlook. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2016; 68(6):479-495. View

2.
Mi Y, Ren K, Pan H, Zhu L, Wu S, You X . Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis. Urolithiasis. 2015; 44(4):353-65. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-015-0832-y. View

3.
Taguchi K, Harper J, Stoller M, Duty B, Sorensen M, Sur R . Identifying factors associated with need for flexible ureteroscope repair: a Western Endourology STone (WEST) research consortium prospective cohort study. Urolithiasis. 2017; 46(6):559-566. DOI: 10.1007/s00240-017-1013-y. View

4.
Canales B, Gleason J, Hicks N, Monga M . Independent analysis of Olympus flexible ureteroscope repairs. Urology. 2007; 70(1):11-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.065. View

5.
Dale J, Kaplan A, Radvak D, Shin R, Ackerman A, Chen T . Evaluation of a Novel Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscope. J Endourol. 2016; 35(6):903-907. DOI: 10.1089/end.2016.0237. View