» Articles » PMID: 36316113

Safe Discharge Criteria After Curative Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

Overview
Date 2022 Oct 31
PMID 36316113
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between clinical and laboratory parameters and complication status to predict which patients can be safely discharged from the hospital on the third postoperative day (POD).

Materials And Methods: Data from a prospectively maintained database of 2,110 consecutive patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent curative surgery were reviewed. The third POD vital signs, laboratory data, and details of the course after surgery were collected. Patients with grade II or higher complications after the third POD were considered unsuitable for early discharge. The performance metrics were calculated for all algorithm parameters. The proposed algorithm was tested using a validation dataset of consecutive patients from the same center.

Results: Of 1,438 patients in the study cohort, 142 (9.9%) were considered unsuitable for early discharge. C-reactive protein level, body temperature, pulse rate, and neutrophil count had good performance metrics and were determined to be independent prognostic factors. An algorithm consisting of these 4 parameters had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.2-97.3), sensitivity of 80.3% (95% CI, 72.8-86.5), and specificity of 51.1% (95% CI, 48.3-53.8). Only 28 (1.9%) patients in the study cohort were classified as false negatives. In the validation dataset, the NPV was 93.7%, sensitivity was 66%, and 3.3% (17/512) of patients were classified as false negatives.

Conclusions: Simple clinical and laboratory parameters obtained on the third POD can be used when making decisions regarding the safe early discharge of patients who underwent gastrectomy.

Citing Articles

Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial using the da Vinci Single Port(SP) robotic system.

Park S, Kim Y, Hwang J, Kim K, Cho M, Kim Y Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):18578.

PMID: 37903856 PMC: 10616185. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-45655-6.


Fluorescence-guided Two-port Robotic Gastrectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Gastrectomy: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Choi S, Kim N, Kim Y, Park S, Kim K, Cho M Ann Surg Open. 2023; 4(3):e318.

PMID: 37746613 PMC: 10513269. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000318.


Short-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic gastrectomy with articulating instruments for gastric cancer compared with the robotic approach.

Lee C, Park S, Park S, Kim K, Cho M, Kim Y Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):9355.

PMID: 37291374 PMC: 10250398. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36601-7.


Decision for Safe Discharge After Gastric Cancer Surgery: The Finale of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program.

Choi Y J Gastric Cancer. 2022; 22(4):261-263.

PMID: 36316104 PMC: 9633927. DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2022.22.e34.

References
1.
. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer. 2020; 24(1):1-21. PMC: 7790804. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y. View

2.
Guner A, Kim S, Yu J, Min I, Roh Y, Roh C . Parameters for Predicting Surgical Outcomes for Gastric Cancer Patients: Simple Is Better Than Complex. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018; 25(11):3239-3247. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6684-2. View

3.
Tian Y, Cao S, Liu X, Li L, He Q, Jiang L . Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Short-term Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Conventional Care in Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (GISSG1901). Ann Surg. 2021; 275(1):e15-e21. PMC: 8683257. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004908. View

4.
Park S, Kang M, Yun E, Jung K . Epidemiology of Gastric Cancer in Korea: Trends in Incidence and Survival Based on Korea Central Cancer Registry Data (1999-2019). J Gastric Cancer. 2022; 22(3):160-168. PMC: 9359882. DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2022.22.e21. View

5.
Korner H, Nielsen H, Soreide J, Nedrebo B, Soreide K, Knapp J . Diagnostic accuracy of C-reactive protein for intraabdominal infections after colorectal resections. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009; 13(9):1599-606. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-0928-1. View