Low-dose Immune Tolerance Induction in Children with Severe Hemophilia A with High-titer Inhibitors: Type of Factor 8 Mutation and Outcomes
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: No studies evaluated the role of mutations in outcomes for low-dose immune tolerance induction (ITI) in people with severe hemophilia A (SHA) with high-titer inhibitors.
Objectives: To explore the association between mutation types and low-dose ITI outcomes in children with SHA with high-titer inhibitors.
Methods: Children SHA with high-titer inhibitors who received low-dose ITI therapy at least for 1 year were included in this study. Based on the risk of inhibitor development, mutations were classified into a high-risk group and a non-high-risk group. Rapid tolerance and the final ITI outcomes were assessed at the 12th and 24th month of treatment, respectively, and the predictor of outcomes was analyzed.
Results: Of 104 children included, 101 had mutations identified. The children with non-high-risk mutations presented a higher rate of rapid tolerance than those with high-risk mutations (61.0% vs. 29.2%; = 0.006). Among 72 children beyond 24 months of ITI, 55 children (76.4%) achieved success, 3 (4.2%) achieved partial success, and 14 (19.4%) failed. The children in the non-high-risk group showed a higher success rate (86.8% vs. 43.8%; = 0.001) and a shorter time to success (mean time, 9.3 months vs. 13.2 months; = 0.04) compared to those in the high-risk group. In multivariable logistic regression, mutations were an independent predictor of ITI success (non-high-risk group vs. high-risk group, adjusted odds ratio [OR], 20.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5-117.8), as was the interval from inhibitor diagnosis to ITI start (adjusted OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99). They remained the significant predictors when success time was taken into account in a Cox model.
Conclusions: Types of mutation were a key predictor of outcomes for low-dose ITI in children with SHA with high-titer inhibitors. It can help to stratify the prognosis and guide clinical decisions.
Sun J, Li Z, Li G, Huang K, Ai D, Liu G Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2022; 6(7):e12824.
PMID: 36313984 PMC: 9606347. DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12824.