» Articles » PMID: 36311207

Muscle Adaptations in Acute SCI Following Overground Exoskeleton + FES Training: A Pilot Study

Overview
Date 2022 Oct 31
PMID 36311207
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the combined effects of robotic exoskeleton and functional electrical stimulation (FES) training on muscle composition during over-ground gait training in persons with acute spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design: Randomized crossover pilot study.

Setting: Inpatient-rehabilitation Hospital.

Participants: Six individuals with acute SCI.

Intervention: Participants were randomized to either receive training with the Ekso® Bionics exoskeleton combined with FES in addition to standard-of-care or standard-of-care alone.

Outcome Measures: The main outcome measures for the study were quantified using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), specifically, lower extremity muscle volume and intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT). Static balance and fall risk were assessed using the Berg Balance Scale.

Results: Significant improvements were observed in muscle volume in the exoskeleton intervention group when compared to only standard-of-care ( < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in IMAT even though the intervention group saw a reduction in IMAT that trended towards statistical significance ( = 0.07). Static balance improved in both groups, with greater improvements seen in the intervention group.

Conclusions: Early intervention with robotic exoskeleton may contribute to improved muscle function measured using MRI in individuals with acute SCI.

References
1.
Karelis A, Carvalho L, Castillo M, Gagnon D, Aubertin-Leheudre M . Effect on body composition and bone mineral density of walking with a robotic exoskeleton in adults with chronic spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2016; 49(1):84-87. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2173. View

2.
Fehlings M, Tetreault L, Wilson J, Kwon B, Burns A, Martin A . A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Introduction, Rationale, and Scope. Global Spine J. 2017; 7(3 Suppl):84S-94S. PMC: 5684846. DOI: 10.1177/2192568217703387. View

3.
Johnston T, Modlesky C, Betz R, Lauer R . Muscle changes following cycling and/or electrical stimulation in pediatric spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 92(12):1937-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.06.031. View

4.
Smith A, Jakubowski K, Wasielewski M, Lee S, Elliott J . Lower extremity muscle structure in incomplete spinal cord injury: a comparison between ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2017; 3:17004. PMC: 5322259. DOI: 10.1038/scsandc.2017.4. View

5.
Elder C, Apple D, Bickel C, Meyer R, Dudley G . Intramuscular fat and glucose tolerance after spinal cord injury--a cross-sectional study. Spinal Cord. 2004; 42(12):711-6. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101652. View