» Articles » PMID: 36307592

Anti-drug Antibody Sample Testing and Reporting Harmonization

Abstract

A clear scientific and operational need exists for harmonized bioanalytical immunogenicity study reporting to facilitate communication of immunogenicity findings and expedient review by industry and health authorities. To address these key bioanalytical reporting gaps and provide a report structure for documenting immunogenicity results, this cross-industry group was formed to establish harmonized recommendations and a develop a submission template to facilitate agency filings. Provided here are recommendations for reporting clinical anti-drug antibody (ADA) assay results using ligand-binding assay technologies. This publication describes the essential bioanalytical report (BAR) elements such as the method, critical reagents and equipment, study samples, results, and data analysis, and provides a template for a suggested structure for the ADA BAR. This publication focuses on the content and presentation of the bioanalytical ADA sample analysis report. The interpretation of immunogenicity data, including the evaluation of the impact of ADA on safety, exposure, and efficacy, is out of scope of this publication.

Citing Articles

Reformation of a Clinical Anti-Drug Antibody Assay to Enable the Immunogenicity Assessment of a Bispecific Antibody Biotherapeutic.

Liu W, Yang J, Yan W, Peng K AAPS J. 2024; 27(1):12.

PMID: 39663290 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-024-00996-6.


Neutralizing Antibody Sample Testing and Report Harmonization.

Jani D, Gunsior M, Marsden R, Cowan K, Irvin S, Hay L AAPS J. 2024; 26(4):80.

PMID: 38992280 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-024-00955-1.


16 GCC Closed Forum: ICH M10 implementation; NGS, qPCR/dPCR, flow cytometry validation; tissue biomarkers; IS response; immunogenicity harmonization; bioanalytical industry status.

Zimmer J, Hays A, Lester T, Diaz M, Thomas E, ODell M Bioanalysis. 2024; 16(11):505-517.

PMID: 38864397 PMC: 11299793. DOI: 10.1080/17576180.2024.2342691.


Method validation of a bridging immunoassay in combination with acid-dissociation and bead treatment for detection of anti-drug antibody.

Du J, Yang Y, Zhu L, Wang S, Yu C, Liu C Heliyon. 2023; 9(3):e13999.

PMID: 36915535 PMC: 10006523. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13999.

References
1.
Myler H, Pedras-Vasconcelos J, Phillips K, Hottenstein C, Chamberlain P, Devanaryan V . Anti-drug Antibody Validation Testing and Reporting Harmonization. AAPS J. 2021; 24(1):4. PMC: 8816448. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-021-00649-y. View

2.
Mire-Sluis A, Barrett Y, Devanarayan V, Koren E, Liu H, Maia M . Recommendations for the design and optimization of immunoassays used in the detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products. J Immunol Methods. 2004; 289(1-2):1-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.jim.2004.06.002. View

3.
Chamberlain P . Effective presentation of immunogenicity risk assessments and related data in regulatory dossiers. Bioanalysis. 2019; 11(17):1581-1592. DOI: 10.4155/bio-2018-0209. View

4.
Shankar G, Devanarayan V, Amaravadi L, Barrett Y, Bowsher R, Finco-Kent D . Recommendations for the validation of immunoassays used for detection of host antibodies against biotechnology products. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008; 48(5):1267-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2008.09.020. View

5.
Shankar G, Arkin S, Cocea L, Devanarayan V, Kirshner S, Kromminga A . Assessment and reporting of the clinical immunogenicity of therapeutic proteins and peptides-harmonized terminology and tactical recommendations. AAPS J. 2014; 16(4):658-73. PMC: 4070270. DOI: 10.1208/s12248-014-9599-2. View