» Articles » PMID: 20404539

Stability of IgG Isotypes in Serum

Overview
Journal MAbs
Date 2010 Apr 21
PMID 20404539
Citations 75
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Drug development from early discovery to late stage commercialization is a long arduous process where a number of factors are taken into consideration when deciding on a particular immunoglobulin isotype for a therapeutic purpose. There are no general rules for which isotype is selected; however, prior experiences, effector function and the specific therapy targeted, as well as extensive testing early in development help in pairing the number of candidates. Over 20 monoclonal antibodies are FDA-approved, and most are IgG1 isotype, although a number of non-IgG1 molecules have been approved recently and the number in development is on the rise. Analytical techniques that examine the physicochemical properties of a molecule provide vital information on the stability and efficacy of candidate antibody therapeutics, but most of these studies are conducted using standard buffers and under well defined storage conditions. It has recently become apparent that analysis of antibody therapeutics recovered after circulation in blood show altered physicochemical characteristics, and in many instances therapeutic molecules recovered from serum show lower potency. This review examines some of these studies, with a focus on the physicochemical changes observed in the molecules. Technologies that can facilitate rapid screening of candidate antibody therapeutics directly from blood are highlighted. The facts indicate that antibody therapeutic development programs must incorporate understanding of the basic biology of the isotype and its stability in serum, which is the intended environment of the therapeutic.

Citing Articles

Antibody-dependent enhancement of coronaviruses.

Tao T, Tian L, Ke J, Zhang C, Li M, Xu X Int J Biol Sci. 2025; 21(4):1686-1704.

PMID: 39990674 PMC: 11844293. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.96112.


Bispecific FpFs: a versatile tool for preclinical antibody development.

Collins M, Ibeanu N, Grabowska W, Awwad S, Khaw P, Brocchini S RSC Chem Biol. 2024; .

PMID: 39347456 PMC: 11427889. DOI: 10.1039/d4cb00130c.


Developability considerations for bispecific and multispecific antibodies.

Amash A, Volkers G, Farber P, Griffin D, Davison K, Goodman A MAbs. 2024; 16(1):2394229.

PMID: 39189686 PMC: 11352713. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2024.2394229.


Neutralizing Antibody Sample Testing and Report Harmonization.

Jani D, Gunsior M, Marsden R, Cowan K, Irvin S, Hay L AAPS J. 2024; 26(4):80.

PMID: 38992280 DOI: 10.1208/s12248-024-00955-1.


Antibody-drug conjugates in gastric cancer: from molecular landscape to clinical strategies.

Hao J, Li X, Liu Y, Lang J, Liu D, Zhang C Gastric Cancer. 2024; 27(5):887-906.

PMID: 38963593 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-024-01529-y.


References
1.
Samaranayake H, Wirth T, Schenkwein D, Raty J, Yla-Herttuala S . Challenges in monoclonal antibody-based therapies. Ann Med. 2009; 41(5):322-31. DOI: 10.1080/07853890802698842. View

2.
Huang L, Biolsi S, Bales K, Kuchibhotla U . Impact of variable domain glycosylation on antibody clearance: an LC/MS characterization. Anal Biochem. 2005; 349(2):197-207. DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2005.11.012. View

3.
Hermeling S, Crommelin D, Schellekens H, Jiskoot W . Structure-immunogenicity relationships of therapeutic proteins. Pharm Res. 2004; 21(6):897-903. DOI: 10.1023/b:pham.0000029275.41323.a6. View

4.
Huang L, Lu J, Wroblewski V, Beals J, Riggin R . In vivo deamidation characterization of monoclonal antibody by LC/MS/MS. Anal Chem. 2005; 77(5):1432-9. DOI: 10.1021/ac0494174. View

5.
Lam X, Yang J, Cleland J . Antioxidants for prevention of methionine oxidation in recombinant monoclonal antibody HER2. J Pharm Sci. 1997; 86(11):1250-5. DOI: 10.1021/js970143s. View