» Articles » PMID: 36307342

The Effects of Different Types of Periodontal Ligament Material Models on Stresses Computed Using Finite Element Models

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2022 Oct 28
PMID 36307342
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Finite element (FE) method has been used to calculate stress in the periodontal ligament (PDL), which is crucial in orthodontic tooth movement. The stress depends on the PDL material property, which varies significantly in previous studies. This study aimed to determine the effects of different PDL properties on stress in PDL using FE analysis.

Methods: A 3-dimensional FE model was created consisting of a maxillary canine, its surrounding PDL, and alveolar bone obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans. One Newton of intrusion force was applied vertically to the crown. Then, the hydrostatic stress and the von Mises stress in the PDL were computed using different PDL material properties, including linear elastic, viscoelastic, hyperelastic, and fiber matrix. Young's modulus (E), used previously from 0.01 to 1000 MPa, and 3 Poisson's ratios, 0.28, 0.45, and 0.49, were simulated for the linear elastic model.

Results: The FE analyses showed consistent patterns of stress distribution. The high stresses are mostly concentrated at the apical area, except for the linear elastic models with high E (E >15 MPa). However, the magnitude varied significantly from -14.77 to -127.58 kPa among the analyzed patients. The E-stress relationship was not linear. The Poisson's ratio did not affect the stress distribution but significantly influenced the stress value. The hydrostatic stress varied from -14.61 to -95.48 kPa.

Conclusions: Different PDL material properties in the FE modeling of dentition do not alter the stress distributions. However, the magnitudes of the stress significantly differ among the patients with the tested material properties.

Citing Articles

Comparative study of torque expression and its biomechanical effects: spherical self-ligating bracket with lock-hook system versus passive self-ligating bracket and conventional bracket.

Liu Y, Guo L, Feng Y, Hua J, Dai Q, Chen Z BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):30.

PMID: 39762853 PMC: 11705846. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05423-6.


Automated Support Generation for Fixed Partial Dentures and Impact of Bone Loss, Bone Quality and Support Types: Parametric Cad and Finite Element Analysis.

Jemaa H, Eisenburger M, Greuling A Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 39727451 PMC: 11674901. DOI: 10.3390/dj12120394.


A New Multi-Axial Functional Stress Analysis Assessing the Longevity of a Ti-6Al-4V Dental Implant Abutment Screw.

Naguib G, Abougazia A, Al-Turki L, Mously H, Hashem A, Mira A Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(11).

PMID: 39590261 PMC: 11591605. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9110689.


Influence of Connector Design on Displacement and Micromotion in Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Dentures Using Different Lengths and Diameters: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.

Mously H, Naguib G, Hashem A, Abougazia A, Binmahfooz A, Hamed M Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(17).

PMID: 39274806 PMC: 11395790. DOI: 10.3390/ma17174416.


The effect of enhanced structure in the posterior segment of clear aligners during anterior retraction: a three-dimensional finite element and experimental model analysis.

Jin X, Tian X, Lee Zhi Hui V, Zheng Y, Song J, Han X Prog Orthod. 2024; 25(1):3.

PMID: 38221549 PMC: 10788328. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-023-00502-2.

References
1.
Liao Z, Chen J, Li W, Darendeliler M, Swain M, Li Q . Biomechanical investigation into the role of the periodontal ligament in optimising orthodontic force: a finite element case study. Arch Oral Biol. 2016; 66:98-107. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.02.012. View

2.
McCormack S, Witzel U, Watson P, Fagan M, Groning F . Inclusion of periodontal ligament fibres in mandibular finite element models leads to an increase in alveolar bone strains. PLoS One. 2017; 12(11):e0188707. PMC: 5708643. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188707. View

3.
Hohmann A, Wolfram U, Geiger M, Boryor A, Sander C, Faltin R . Periodontal ligament hydrostatic pressure with areas of root resorption after application of a continuous torque moment. Angle Orthod. 2007; 77(4):653-9. DOI: 10.2319/060806-234. View

4.
Toms S, Dakin G, Lemons J, Eberhardt A . Quasi-linear viscoelastic behavior of the human periodontal ligament. J Biomech. 2002; 35(10):1411-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00166-5. View

5.
Vollmer D, Bourauel C, Maier K, Jager A . Determination of the centre of resistance in an upper human canine and idealized tooth model. Eur J Orthod. 2000; 21(6):633-48. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/21.6.633. View