» Articles » PMID: 36304266

NetRank Recovers Known Cancer Hallmark Genes As Universal Biomarker Signature for Cancer Outcome Prediction

Overview
Journal Front Bioinform
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Oct 28
PMID 36304266
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gene expression can serve as a powerful predictor for disease progression and other phenotypes. Consequently, microarrays, which capture gene expression genome-wide, have been used widely over the past two decades to derive biomarker signatures for tasks such as cancer grading, prognosticating the formation of metastases, survival, and others. Each of these signatures was selected and optimized for a very specific phenotype, tissue type, and experimental set-up. While all of these differences may naturally contribute to very heterogeneous and different biomarker signatures, all cancers share characteristics regardless of particular cell types or tissue as summarized in the hallmarks of cancer. These commonalities could give rise to biomarker signatures, which perform well across different phenotypes, cell and tissue types. Here, we explore this possibility by employing a network-based approach for pan-cancer biomarker discovery. We implement a random surfer model, which integrates interaction, expression, and phenotypic information to rank genes by their suitability for outcome prediction. To evaluate our approach, we assembled 105 high-quality microarray datasets sampled from around 13,000 patients and covering 13 cancer types. We applied our approach (NetRank) to each dataset and aggregated individual signatures into one compact signature of 50 genes. This signature stands out for two reasons. First, in contrast to other signatures of the 105 datasets, it is performant across nearly all cancer types and phenotypes. Second, It is interpretable, as the majority of genes are linked to the hallmarks of cancer in general and proliferation specifically. Many of the identified genes are cancer drivers with a known mutation burden linked to cancer. Overall, our work demonstrates the power of network-based approaches to compose robust, compact, and universal biomarker signatures for cancer outcome prediction.

Citing Articles

Netrank: network-based approach for biomarker discovery.

Al-Fatlawi A, Rusadze E, Shmelkin A, Malekian N, Ozen C, Pilarsky C BMC Bioinformatics. 2023; 24(1):304.

PMID: 37516832 PMC: 10387193. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-023-05418-6.


Delineating the glioblastoma stemness by genes involved in cytoskeletal rearrangements and metabolic alterations.

Kaluzinska-Kolat Z, Kolat D, Kosla K, Pluciennik E, Bednarek A World J Stem Cells. 2023; 15(5):302-322.

PMID: 37342224 PMC: 10277965. DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v15.i5.302.


Identification of protein-protein interaction bridges for multiple sclerosis.

Yazici G, Kurt Vatandaslar B, Aydin Canturk I, Aydinli F, Arici Duz O, Karakoc E Bioinformatics. 2023; 39(4).

PMID: 37018152 PMC: 10115466. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad175.

References
1.
Brezgyte G, Shah V, Jach D, Crnogorac-Jurcevic T . Non-Invasive Biomarkers for Earlier Detection of Pancreatic Cancer-A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(11). PMC: 8198035. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112722. View

2.
Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M . A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(27):2817-26. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa041588. View

3.
Waro B, Aasly J . Exploring cancer in mutation carriers and idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Brain Behav. 2018; 8(1):e00858. PMC: 5853627. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.858. View

4.
J van t Veer L, Dai H, van de Vijver M, He Y, Hart A, Mao M . Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer. Nature. 2002; 415(6871):530-6. DOI: 10.1038/415530a. View

5.
Gautier L, Cope L, Bolstad B, Irizarry R . affy--analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip data at the probe level. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20(3):307-15. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg405. View