» Articles » PMID: 36303798

Machine Learning for Causal Inference in Biological Networks: Perspectives of This Challenge

Overview
Journal Front Bioinform
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Oct 28
PMID 36303798
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most machine learning-based methods predict outcomes rather than understanding causality. Machine learning methods have been proved to be efficient in finding correlations in data, but unskilful to determine causation. This issue severely limits the applicability of machine learning methods to infer the causal relationships between the entities of a biological network, and more in general of any dynamical system, such as medical intervention strategies and clinical outcomes system, that is representable as a network. From the perspective of those who want to use the results of network inference not only to understand the mechanisms underlying the dynamics, but also to understand how the network reacts to external stimuli (e. g. environmental factors, therapeutic treatments), tools that can understand the causal relationships between data are highly demanded. Given the increasing popularity of machine learning techniques in computational biology and the recent literature proposing the use of machine learning techniques for the inference of biological networks, we would like to present the challenges that mathematics and computer science research faces in generalising machine learning to an approach capable of understanding causal relationships, and the prospects that achieving this will open up for the medical application domains of systems biology, the main paradigm of which is precisely network biology at any physical scale.

Citing Articles

Causal machine learning models for predicting low birth weight in midwife-led continuity care intervention in North Shoa Zone, Ethiopia.

Moges W, Tegegne A, Mitku A, Tesfahun E, Hailemeskel S BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025; 25(1):64.

PMID: 39920662 PMC: 11806756. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-025-02917-9.


Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven approach to climate action and sustainable development.

Cho H, Ackom E Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1228.

PMID: 39890783 PMC: 11785942. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-53956-1.


Identification of diagnostic candidate genes in COVID-19 patients with sepsis.

Li J, Pu S, Shu L, Guo M, He Z Immun Inflamm Dis. 2024; 12(10):e70033.

PMID: 39377750 PMC: 11460023. DOI: 10.1002/iid3.70033.


Gene regulatory networks in disease and ageing.

Unger Avila P, Padvitski T, Leote A, Chen H, Saez-Rodriguez J, Kann M Nat Rev Nephrol. 2024; 20(9):616-633.

PMID: 38867109 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-024-00849-7.


The use of machine learning on administrative and survey data to predict suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a systematic review.

Some N, Noormohammadpour P, Lange S Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1291362.

PMID: 38501090 PMC: 10944962. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1291362.


References
1.
Kc K, Li R, Cui F, Yu Q, Haake A . GNE: a deep learning framework for gene network inference by aggregating biological information. BMC Syst Biol. 2019; 13(Suppl 2):38. PMC: 6449883. DOI: 10.1186/s12918-019-0694-y. View

2.
Arredondo T, Ormazabal W . Meta-learning framework applied in bioinformatics inference system design. Int J Data Min Bioinform. 2015; 11(2):139-66. DOI: 10.1504/ijdmb.2015.066775. View

3.
Mayeux R . Biomarkers: potential uses and limitations. NeuroRx. 2005; 1(2):182-8. PMC: 534923. DOI: 10.1602/neurorx.1.2.182. View

4.
Angermueller C, Lee H, Reik W, Stegle O . DeepCpG: accurate prediction of single-cell DNA methylation states using deep learning. Genome Biol. 2017; 18(1):67. PMC: 5387360. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-017-1189-z. View

5.
Zhang K, Huang B, Zhang J, Glymour C, Scholkopf B . Causal Discovery from Nonstationary/Heterogeneous Data: Skeleton Estimation and Orientation Determination. IJCAI (U S). 2017; 2017:1347-1353. PMC: 5617646. DOI: 10.24963/ijcai.2017/187. View