» Articles » PMID: 36285630

Mean Kurtosis-Curve (MK-Curve) Correction Improves the Test-retest Reproducibility of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging at 3 T

Overview
Journal NMR Biomed
Publisher Wiley
Date 2022 Oct 26
PMID 36285630
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) is applied to gain insights into the microstructural organization of brain tissues. However, the reproducibility of DKI outside brain white matter, particularly in combination with advanced estimation to remedy its noise sensitivity, remains poorly characterized. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the variability and reliability of DKI metrics while correcting implausible values with a fit method called mean kurtosis (MK)-Curve. A total of 10 volunteers (four women; age: 41.4 ± 9.6 years) were included and underwent two MRI examinations of the brain. The images were acquired on a clinical 3-T scanner and included a T1-weighted image and a diffusion sequence with multiple diffusion weightings suitable for DKI. Region of interest analysis of common kurtosis and tensor metrics derived with the MK-Curve DKI fit was performed, including intraclass correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman (BA) plot statistics. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The analyses showed good to excellent agreement of both kurtosis tensor- and diffusion tensor-derived MK-Curve-corrected metrics (ICC values: 0.77-0.98 and 0.87-0.98, respectively), with the exception of two DKI-derived metrics (axial kurtosis in the cortex: ICC = 0.68, and radial kurtosis in deep gray matter: ICC = 0.544). Non-MK-Curve-corrected kurtosis tensor-derived metrics ranged from 0.01 to 0.52 and diffusion tensor-derived metrics from 0.06 to 0.66, indicating poor to moderate reliability. No structural bias was observed in the BA plots for any of the diffusion metrics. In conclusion, MK-Curve-corrected DKI metrics of the human brain can be reliably acquired in white and gray matter at 3 T and DKI metrics have good to excellent agreement in a test-retest setting.

Citing Articles

Denoising Improves Cross-Scanner and Cross-Protocol Test-Retest Reproducibility of Diffusion Tensor and Kurtosis Imaging.

Ades-Aron B, Coelho S, Lemberskiy G, Veraart J, Baete S, Shepherd T Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(4):e70142.

PMID: 40051327 PMC: 11885890. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70142.


Mean kurtosis-Curve (MK-Curve) correction improves the test-retest reproducibility of diffusion kurtosis imaging at 3 T.

Christiaanse E, Wyss P, Scheel-Sailer A, Frotzler A, Lehnick D, Verma R NMR Biomed. 2022; 36(3):e4856.

PMID: 36285630 PMC: 10078439. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4856.

References
1.
Shahim P, Holleran L, Kim J, Brody D . Test-retest reliability of high spatial resolution diffusion tensor and diffusion kurtosis imaging. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):11141. PMC: 5593980. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11747-3. View

2.
Perrone D, Aelterman J, Pizurica A, Jeurissen B, Philips W, Leemans A . The effect of Gibbs ringing artifacts on measures derived from diffusion MRI. Neuroimage. 2015; 120:441-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.068. View

3.
De Luca A, Ianus A, Leemans A, Palombo M, Shemesh N, Zhang H . On the generalizability of diffusion MRI signal representations across acquisition parameters, sequences and tissue types: Chronicles of the MEMENTO challenge. Neuroimage. 2021; 240:118367. PMC: 7615259. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118367. View

4.
Lu H, Jensen J, Ramani A, Helpern J . Three-dimensional characterization of non-gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging. NMR Biomed. 2006; 19(2):236-47. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.1020. View

5.
Kasa L, Haast R, Kuehn T, Mushtaha F, Baron C, Peters T . Evaluating High Spatial Resolution Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging at 3T: Reproducibility and Quality of Fit. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020; 53(4):1175-1187. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27408. View