» Articles » PMID: 36284018

Advancement and Obstacles in Microfluidics-based Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles

Overview
Specialty Chemistry
Date 2022 Oct 25
PMID 36284018
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is a great need for techniques which enable reproducible separation of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from biofluids with high recovery, purity and throughput. The development of new techniques for isolation of EVs from minute sample volumes is instrumental in enabling EV-based biomarker profiling in large biobank cohorts and paves the way to improved diagnostic profiles in precision medicine. Recent advances in microfluidics-based devices offer a toolbox for separating EVs from small sample volumes. Microfluidic devices that have been used in EV isolation utilise different fundamental principles and rely largely on benefits of scaling laws as the biofluid processing is miniaturised to chip level. Here, we review the progress in the practicality and performance of both passive devices (such as mechanical filtering and hydrodynamic focusing) and active devices (using magnetic, electric or acoustic fields). As it stands, many microfluidic devices isolate intact EV populations at higher purities than centrifugation, precipitation or size-exclusion chromatography. However, this comes at a cost. We address challenges (in particular low throughput, clogging risks and ability to process biofluids) and highlight the need for more improvements in microfluidic devices. Finally, we conclude that there is a need to refine and standardise these lab-on-a-chip techniques to meet the growing interest in the diagnostic and therapeutic value of purified EVs.

Citing Articles

Emerging Frontiers in acute kidney injury: The role of extracellular vesicles.

Li S, Zhou L, Huang Y, Tang S Bioact Mater. 2025; 48:149-170.

PMID: 40046015 PMC: 11880721. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.02.018.


A comparative analysis of small extracellular vesicle (sEV) micro-RNA (miRNA) isolation and sequencing procedures in blood plasma samples.

Abeysinghe P, Turner N, Mitchell M Extracell Vesicles Circ Nucl Acids. 2024; 5(1):119-137.

PMID: 39698410 PMC: 11648519. DOI: 10.20517/evcna.2023.55.


Deciphering the role of host-gut microbiota crosstalk via diverse sources of extracellular vesicles in colorectal cancer.

Song Y, Shi M, Wang Y Mol Med. 2024; 30(1):200.

PMID: 39501131 PMC: 11536884. DOI: 10.1186/s10020-024-00976-8.


Extracellular vesicle mimetics as delivery vehicles for oligonucleotide-based therapeutics and plasmid DNA.

Oshchepkova A, Chernikov I, Miroshnichenko S, Patutina O, Markov O, Savin I Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1437817.

PMID: 39493304 PMC: 11528538. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1437817.


Nanoscale Extracellular Vesicle-Enabled Liquid Biopsy: Advances and Challenges for Lung Cancer Detection.

Khan A, Raza F, He N Micromachines (Basel). 2024; 15(10).

PMID: 39459055 PMC: 11509190. DOI: 10.3390/mi15101181.


References
1.
Linares R, Tan S, Gounou C, Arraud N, Brisson A . High-speed centrifugation induces aggregation of extracellular vesicles. J Extracell Vesicles. 2015; 4:29509. PMC: 4689953. DOI: 10.3402/jev.v4.29509. View

2.
Ding M, Wang C, Lu X, Zhang C, Zhou Z, Chen X . Comparison of commercial exosome isolation kits for circulating exosomal microRNA profiling. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018; 410(16):3805-3814. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-018-1052-4. View

3.
Lo T, Zhu Z, Purcell E, Watza D, Wang J, Kang Y . Microfluidic device for high-throughput affinity-based isolation of extracellular vesicles. Lab Chip. 2020; 20(10):1762-1770. PMC: 7328786. DOI: 10.1039/c9lc01190k. View

4.
Chen C, Skog J, Hsu C, Lessard R, Balaj L, Wurdinger T . Microfluidic isolation and transcriptome analysis of serum microvesicles. Lab Chip. 2010; 10(4):505-11. PMC: 3136803. DOI: 10.1039/b916199f. View

5.
Kanwar S, Dunlay C, Simeone D, Nagrath S . Microfluidic device (ExoChip) for on-chip isolation, quantification and characterization of circulating exosomes. Lab Chip. 2014; 14(11):1891-900. PMC: 4134440. DOI: 10.1039/c4lc00136b. View