» Articles » PMID: 36277835

Interactions Between Seasonal Temperature Variation and Temporal Synchrony Drive Increased Arbovirus Co-infection Incidence

Overview
Journal R Soc Open Sci
Specialty Science
Date 2022 Oct 24
PMID 36277835
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Though instances of arthropod-borne (arbo)virus co-infection have been documented clinically, the overall incidence of arbovirus co-infection and its drivers are not well understood. Now that dengue, Zika and chikungunya viruses are all in circulation across tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas, it is important to understand the environmental and biological conditions that make co-infections more likely to occur. To understand this, we developed a mathematical model of co-circulation of two arboviruses, with transmission parameters approximating dengue, Zika and/or chikungunya viruses, and co-infection possible in both humans and mosquitoes. We examined the influence of seasonal timing of arbovirus co-circulation on the extent of co-infection. By undertaking a sensitivity analysis of this model, we examined how biological factors interact with seasonality to determine arbovirus co-infection transmission and prevalence. We found that temporal synchrony of the co-infecting viruses and average temperature were the most influential drivers of co-infection incidence. Our model highlights the synergistic effect of co-transmission from mosquitoes, which leads to more than double the number of co-infections than would be expected in a scenario without co-transmission. Our results suggest that appreciable numbers of co-infections are unlikely to occur except in tropical climates when the viruses co-occur in time and space.

Citing Articles

WNV and SLEV coinfection in avian and mosquito hosts: impact on viremia, antibody responses, and vector competence.

Gallichotte E, Fitzmeyer E, Williams L, Spangler M, Bosco-Lauth A, Ebel G J Virol. 2024; 98(10):e0104124.

PMID: 39324792 PMC: 11495067. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.01041-24.

References
1.
Magalhaes T, Robison A, Young M, Black 4th W, Foy B, Ebel G . Sequential Infection of Mosquitoes with Chikungunya Virus and Zika Virus Enhances Early Zika Virus Transmission. Insects. 2018; 9(4). PMC: 6315929. DOI: 10.3390/insects9040177. View

2.
Katzelnick L, Bos S, Harris E . Protective and enhancing interactions among dengue viruses 1-4 and Zika virus. Curr Opin Virol. 2020; 43:59-70. PMC: 7655628. DOI: 10.1016/j.coviro.2020.08.006. View

3.
Chan M, Johansson M . The incubation periods of Dengue viruses. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e50972. PMC: 3511440. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050972. View

4.
Burt F, Chen W, Miner J, Lenschow D, Merits A, Schnettler E . Chikungunya virus: an update on the biology and pathogenesis of this emerging pathogen. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017; 17(4):e107-e117. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30385-1. View

5.
Freitas L, Cruz O, Lowe R, Carvalho M . Space-time dynamics of a triple epidemic: dengue, chikungunya and Zika clusters in the city of Rio de Janeiro. Proc Biol Sci. 2019; 286(1912):20191867. PMC: 6790786. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1867. View