» Articles » PMID: 36262373

Neural Synchrony in Cortical Networks: Mechanisms and Implications for Neural Information Processing and Coding

Overview
Date 2022 Oct 20
PMID 36262373
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Synchronization of neuronal discharges on the millisecond scale has long been recognized as a prevalent and functionally important attribute of neural activity. In this article, I review classical concepts and corresponding evidence of the mechanisms that govern the synchronization of distributed discharges in cortical networks and relate those mechanisms to their possible roles in coding and cognitive functions. To accommodate the need for a selective, synchronization of cells, I propose that synchronous firing of distributed neurons is a natural consequence of spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) that associates cells repetitively receiving temporally coherent input: the "synchrony through synaptic plasticity" hypothesis. Neurons that are excited by a repeated sequence of synaptic inputs may learn to selectively respond to the onset of this sequence through synaptic plasticity. Multiple neurons receiving coherent input could thus actively synchronize their firing by learning to selectively respond at corresponding temporal positions. The hypothesis makes several predictions: first, the position of the cells in the network, as well as the source of their input signals, would be irrelevant as long as their input signals arrive simultaneously; second, repeating discharge patterns should get compressed until all or some part of the signals are synchronized; and third, this compression should be accompanied by a sparsening of signals. In this way, selective groups of cells could emerge that would respond to some recurring event with synchronous firing. Such a learned response pattern could further be modulated by synchronous network oscillations that provide a dynamic, flexible context for the synaptic integration of distributed signals. I conclude by suggesting experimental approaches to further test this new hypothesis.

Citing Articles

Evolving alterations of structural organization and functional connectivity in feedforward neural networks after induced P301L tau mutation.

Weir J, Hanssen K, Winter-Hjelm N, Sandvig A, Sandvig I Eur J Neurosci. 2024; 60(12):7228-7248.

PMID: 39622242 PMC: 11647444. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16625.


Measuring Neuronal Network Activity Using Human Induced Neuronal Cells.

McSweeney D, English J, Howell E, Ribbe F, Pak C Methods Mol Biol. 2023; 2683:235-245.

PMID: 37300780 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-3287-1_19.


Pathogenesis of Dementia.

Blaszczyk J Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(1).

PMID: 36613988 PMC: 9820433. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010543.

References
1.
Gray C, Engel A, Konig P, Singer W . Synchronization of oscillatory neuronal responses in cat striate cortex: temporal properties. Vis Neurosci. 1992; 8(4):337-47. DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800005071. View

2.
Markowitz D, Collman F, Brody C, Hopfield J, Tank D . Rate-specific synchrony: using noisy oscillations to detect equally active neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(24):8422-7. PMC: 2448852. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803183105. View

3.
Gawne T, Kjaer T, Hertz J, Richmond B . Adjacent visual cortical complex cells share about 20% of their stimulus-related information. Cereb Cortex. 1996; 6(3):482-9. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/6.3.482. View

4.
Volgushev M, Chistiakova M, Singer W . Modification of discharge patterns of neocortical neurons by induced oscillations of the membrane potential. Neuroscience. 1998; 83(1):15-25. DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(97)00380-1. View

5.
Renart A, de la Rocha J, Bartho P, Hollender L, Parga N, Reyes A . The asynchronous state in cortical circuits. Science. 2010; 327(5965):587-90. PMC: 2861483. DOI: 10.1126/science.1179850. View