» Articles » PMID: 18232737

Sparse Representation of Sounds in the Unanesthetized Auditory Cortex

Overview
Journal PLoS Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2008 Feb 1
PMID 18232737
Citations 281
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

How do neuronal populations in the auditory cortex represent acoustic stimuli? Although sound-evoked neural responses in the anesthetized auditory cortex are mainly transient, recent experiments in the unanesthetized preparation have emphasized subpopulations with other response properties. To quantify the relative contributions of these different subpopulations in the awake preparation, we have estimated the representation of sounds across the neuronal population using a representative ensemble of stimuli. We used cell-attached recording with a glass electrode, a method for which single-unit isolation does not depend on neuronal activity, to quantify the fraction of neurons engaged by acoustic stimuli (tones, frequency modulated sweeps, white-noise bursts, and natural stimuli) in the primary auditory cortex of awake head-fixed rats. We find that the population response is sparse, with stimuli typically eliciting high firing rates (>20 spikes/second) in less than 5% of neurons at any instant. Some neurons had very low spontaneous firing rates (<0.01 spikes/second). At the other extreme, some neurons had driven rates in excess of 50 spikes/second. Interestingly, the overall population response was well described by a lognormal distribution, rather than the exponential distribution that is often reported. Our results represent, to our knowledge, the first quantitative evidence for sparse representations of sounds in the unanesthetized auditory cortex. Our results are compatible with a model in which most neurons are silent much of the time, and in which representations are composed of small dynamic subsets of highly active neurons.

Citing Articles

Neuroevolution gives rise to more focused information transfer compared to backpropagation in recurrent neural networks.

Hintze A, Adami C Neural Comput Appl. 2025; 37(2):757-767.

PMID: 39866639 PMC: 11757640. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-022-08125-0.


Hemispheric Asymmetry of Intracortical Myelin Orientation in the Mouse Auditory Cortex.

Ruthig P, Muller G, Fink M, Scherf N, Morawski M, Schonwiesner M Eur J Neurosci. 2025; 61(2):e16675.

PMID: 39831689 PMC: 11744913. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.16675.


A spatial code for temporal information is necessary for efficient sensory learning.

Bagur S, Bourg J, Kempf A, Tarpin T, Bergaoui K, Guo Y Sci Adv. 2025; 11(2):eadr6214.

PMID: 39772691 PMC: 11708902. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adr6214.


Poisson Variational Autoencoder.

Vafaii H, Galor D, Yates J ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39713798 PMC: 11661288.


Preconfigured cortico-thalamic neural dynamics constrain movement-associated thalamic activity.

Gonzalez-Pereyra P, Sanchez-Lobato O, Martinez-Montalvo M, Ortega-Romero D, Perez-Diaz C, Merchant H Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10185.

PMID: 39582075 PMC: 11586408. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54742-9.


References
1.
Gerstein G, Kiang N . RESPONSES OF SINGLE UNITS IN THE AUDITORY CORTEX. Exp Neurol. 1964; 10:1-18. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4886(64)90083-4. View

2.
Markram H, Toledo-Rodriguez M, Wang Y, Gupta A, Silberberg G, Wu C . Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004; 5(10):793-807. DOI: 10.1038/nrn1519. View

3.
Kilgard M, Merzenich M . Distributed representation of spectral and temporal information in rat primary auditory cortex. Hear Res. 1999; 134(1-2):16-28. PMC: 2955153. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00061-1. View

4.
Doron N, LeDoux J, Semple M . Redefining the tonotopic core of rat auditory cortex: physiological evidence for a posterior field. J Comp Neurol. 2002; 453(4):345-60. DOI: 10.1002/cne.10412. View

5.
Read H, Winer J, Schreiner C . Functional architecture of auditory cortex. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002; 12(4):433-40. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00342-2. View