International Survey Among Surgeons on the Perioperative Management of Rectal Cancer

Overview

Journal Surg Endosc

Publisher Springer

Specialties Gastroenterology
General Surgery
Radiology

Date 2022 Oct 18

PMID 36258001

Authors

Zaid Al-Difaie

Nariaki Okamoto

Max H M C Scheepers

Didier Mutter

Laurents P S Stassen

Nicole D Bouvy

Jacques Marescaux

Bernard Dallemagne

Michele Diana

Mahdi Al-Taher

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Several pivotal studies and international guidelines on the perioperative management of rectal cancer have been published. However, little is known about the current state of perioperative management of rectal cancer patients in clinical practice worldwide.

Methods: An online survey including 13 questions focusing on key topics related to the perioperative management of patients with rectal cancer was conducted among colorectal surgeons registered within the database of the Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer (IRCAD).

Results: A total of 535 respondents from 89 countries participated in the survey. Most surgeons worked in the European region (40.9%). Two hundred and fifty-four respondents (47.5%) performed less than 25% of surgical procedures laparoscopically. The most commonly used definition of the upper limit of the rectum was a fixed distance from the anal verge (23.4%). Magnetic resonance imaging was used to define the upper limit of the rectum by 258 respondents (48.2%). During total mesorectal excision (TME), 301 respondents (56.3%) used a high-tie technique. The most commonly constructed anastomosis was an end-to-end anastomosis (68.2%) with the majority of surgeons performing a leak test intraoperatively (88.9%). A total of 355 respondents (66.4%) constructed a diverting ostomy, and the majority of these surgeons constructed an enterostomy (82%). A total of 208 respondents (39.3%) closed a stoma within 8 weeks. Lastly, 135 respondents (25.2%) introduced a solid diet on postoperative day 1.

Conclusion: There is considerable heterogeneity in the perioperative management of rectal cancer patients worldwide with several discrepancies between current international practice and recommendations from international guidelines. To achieve worldwide standardization in rectal cancer care, further research is needed to elucidate the cause of this heterogeneity and find ways of improved implementation of best practice recommendations.

Citing Articles

Safe implementation of robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis.

Van Eetvelde E, Violon S, Poortmans N, Stijns J, Duinslaeger M, Vanhoeij M J Robot Surg. 2022; 17(3):1071-1076.

PMID: 36566471 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01514-6.

International survey among surgeons on the perioperative management of rectal cancer.

Al-Difaie Z, Okamoto N, Scheepers M, Mutter D, Stassen L, Bouvy N Surg Endosc. 2022; 37(3):1901-1915.

PMID: 36258001 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09702-z.

Laparoscopic right colectomies with intracorporeal compared to extracorporeal anastomotic techniques are associated with reduced post-operative incisional hernias.

Selznick S, Levy J, Bogdan R, Hawel J, Elnahas A, Alkhamesi N Surg Endosc. 2022; 37(7):5500-5508.

PMID: 36192658 PMC: 9529334. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09585-0.

References

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel R, Torre L, Jemal A . Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6):394-424. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21492. View

Heald R, Husband E, Ryall R . The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery--the clue to pelvic recurrence?. Br J Surg. 1982; 69(10):613-6. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800691019. View

Baek J, McKenzie S, Garcia-Aguilar J, Pigazzi A . Oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for the treatment of rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010; 251(5):882-6. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181c79114. View

Kapiteijn E, Marijnen C, Nagtegaal I, Putter H, Steup W, Wiggers T . Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(9):638-46. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa010580. View

Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent D, Boller A, George V, Abbas M . Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015; 314(13):1346-55. PMC: 5140087. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.10529. View

Stevenson A, Solomon M, Lumley J, Hewett P, Clouston A, Gebski V . Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015; 314(13):1356-63. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2015.12009. View

Al-Difaie Z, Okamoto N, Scheepers M, Mutter D, Stassen L, Bouvy N . International survey among surgeons on the perioperative management of rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2022; 37(3):1901-1915. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09702-z. View

Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I . Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (3):MR000008. PMC: 8941848. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4. View

You Y, Hardiman K, Bafford A, Poylin V, Francone T, Davis K . The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020; 63(9):1191-1222. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001762. View

10.

Benson A, Venook A, Al-Hawary M, Arain M, Chen Y, Ciombor K . NCCN Guidelines Insights: Rectal Cancer, Version 6.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020; 18(7):806-815. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0032. View

11.

Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, Brown G, Rodel C, Cervantes A . Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017; 28(suppl_4):iv22-iv40. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx224. View

12.

Li F, Wang B, Lu S, Wang Y, Sun T, Wang H . Comparison of the sigmoid take-off with other definitions of the rectosigmoid junction: A retrospective comparative cohort analysis. Int J Surg. 2020; 80:168-174. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.039. View

13.

DSouza N, Lord A, Shaw A, Patel A, Balyasnikova S, Tudyka V . The sigmoid take-off: An anatomical imaging definition of the rectum validated on specimen analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020; 46(9):1668-1672. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.01.008. View

14.

Faletti R, Gatti M, Arezzo A, Stola S, Benedini M, Bergamasco L . Preoperative staging of rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with pathological staging. Minerva Chir. 2017; 73(1):13-19. DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4733.17.07392-8. View

15.

Klessen C, Rogalla P, Taupitz M . Local staging of rectal cancer: the current role of MRI. Eur Radiol. 2006; 17(2):379-89. PMC: 1779628. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0388-x. View

16.

Bonjer H, Deijen C, Abis G, Cuesta M, van der Pas M, de Lange-de Klerk E . A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015; 372(14):1324-32. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882. View

17.

Jayne D, Guillou P, Thorpe H, Quirke P, Copeland J, Smith A . Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(21):3061-8. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758. View

18.

Jeong S, Park J, Nam B, Kim S, Kang S, Lim S . Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15(7):767-74. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70205-0. View

19.

Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent D, Boller A, George V, Abbas M . Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence for Laparoscopic Resection Compared With Open Resection of Stage II to III Rectal Cancer: Follow-up Results of the ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg. 2018; 269(4):589-595. PMC: 6360134. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003002. View

20.

Stevenson A, Solomon M, Brown C, Lumley J, Hewett P, Clouston A . Disease-free Survival and Local Recurrence After Laparoscopic-assisted Resection or Open Resection for Rectal Cancer: The Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2018; 269(4):596-602. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003021. View