» Articles » PMID: 33733061

Fireflies Produce Ultrasonic Clicks During Flight As a Potential Aposematic Anti-bat Signal

Overview
Journal iScience
Publisher Cell Press
Date 2021 Mar 18
PMID 33733061
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fireflies are known for emitting light signals for intraspecific communication. However, in doing so, they reveal themselves to many potential nocturnal predators from a large distance. Therefore, many fireflies evolved unpalatable compounds and probably use their light signals as anti-predator aposematic signals. Fireflies are occasionally attacked by predators despite their warning flashes. Bats are among the most substantial potential firefly predators. Using their echolocation, bats might detect a firefly from a short distance and attack it in between two flashes. We thus aimed to examine whether fireflies use additional measures of warning, specifically focusing on sound signals. We recorded four species from different genera of fireflies in Vietnam and Israel and found that all of them generated ultrasonic clicks centered around bats' hearing range. Clicks were synchronized with the wingbeat and are probably produced by the wings. We hypothesize that ultrasonic clicks can serve as part of a multimodal aposematic display.

Citing Articles

Beetle bioluminescence outshines extant aerial predators.

Powell G, Saxton N, Pacheco Y, Stanger-Hall K, Martin G, Kusy D Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1979):20220821.

PMID: 35855602 PMC: 9297012. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0821.


Anti-bat ultrasound production in moths is globally and phylogenetically widespread.

Barber J, Plotkin D, Rubin J, Homziak N, Leavell B, Houlihan P Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022; 119(25):e2117485119.

PMID: 35704762 PMC: 9231501. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2117485119.


Insect Collections as an Untapped Source of Bioactive Compounds-Fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae) and Cardiotonic Steroids as a Proof of Concept.

Berger A, Petschenka G, Degenkolb T, Geisthardt M, Vilcinskas A Insects. 2021; 12(8).

PMID: 34442254 PMC: 8396437. DOI: 10.3390/insects12080689.

References
1.
Rydell J . Bat defence in lekking ghost swifts (Hepialus humuli), a moth without ultrasonic hearing. Proc Biol Sci. 1998; 265(1404):1373-6. PMC: 1689220. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0444. View

2.
Halfwerk W, Dixon M, Ottens K, Taylor R, Ryan M, Page R . Risks of multimodal signaling: bat predators attend to dynamic motion in frog sexual displays. J Exp Biol. 2014; 217(Pt 17):3038-44. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.107482. View

3.
Barbero F, Thomas J, Bonelli S, Balletto E, Schonrogge K . Queen ants make distinctive sounds that are mimicked by a butterfly social parasite. Science. 2009; 323(5915):782-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1163583. View

4.
Martin G, Branham M, Whiting M, Bybee S . Total evidence phylogeny and the evolution of adult bioluminescence in fireflies (Coleoptera: Lampyridae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016; 107:564-575. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.12.017. View

5.
Heffner R, Koay G, Heffner H . Hearing in American leaf-nosed bats. III: Artibeus jamaicensis. Hear Res. 2003; 184(1-2):113-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00233-8. View