Patient-reported Outcomes Via Electronic Health Record Portal Versus Telephone: a Pragmatic Randomized Pilot Trial of Anxiety or Depression Symptoms in Epilepsy
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To close gaps between research and clinical practice, tools are needed for efficient pragmatic trial recruitment and patient-reported outcome collection. The objective was to assess feasibility and process measures for patient-reported outcome collection in a randomized trial comparing electronic health record (EHR) patient portal questionnaires to telephone interview among adults with epilepsy and anxiety or depression symptoms.
Materials And Methods: Recruitment for the randomized trial began at an epilepsy clinic visit, with EHR-embedded validated anxiety and depression instruments, followed by automated EHR-based research screening consent and eligibility assessment. Fully eligible individuals later completed telephone consent, enrollment, and randomization. Participants were randomized 1:1 to EHR portal versus telephone outcome assessment, and patient-reported and process outcomes were collected at 3 and 6 months, with primary outcome 6-month retention in EHR arm (feasibility target: ≥11 participants retained).
Results: Participants ( = 30) were 60% women, 77% White/non-Hispanic, with mean age 42.5 years. Among 15 individuals randomized to EHR portal, 10 (67%, CI 41.7%-84.8%) met the 6-month retention endpoint, versus 100% (CI 79.6%-100%) in the telephone group ( = 0.04). EHR outcome collection at 6 months required 11.8 min less research staff time per participant than telephone (5.9, CI 3.3-7.7 vs 17.7, CI 14.1-20.2). Subsequent telephone contact after unsuccessful EHR attempts enabled near complete data collection and still saved staff time.
Discussion: In this randomized study, EHR portal outcome assessment did not meet the retention feasibility target, but EHR method saved research staff time compared to telephone.
Conclusion: While EHR portal outcome assessment was not feasible, hybrid EHR/telephone method was feasible and saved staff time.
Munger Clary H, Snively B, Cagle C, Kennerly R, Kimball J, Alexander H JMIR Res Protoc. 2024; 13:e59329.
PMID: 39535875 PMC: 11602765. DOI: 10.2196/59329.
Munger Clary H, Snively B, Kumi-Ansu Y, Alexander H, Kimball J, Duncan P Epilepsy Res. 2024; 204:107396.
PMID: 38908323 PMC: 11457121. DOI: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107396.
Silveira Bianchim M, Crane E, Jones A, Neukirchinger B, Roberts G, Mclaughlin L PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0290976.
PMID: 38055759 PMC: 10699630. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290976.
Kodama K, Konishi S, Manabe S, Okada K, Yamaguchi J, Wada S JMIR Nurs. 2023; 6:e51303.
PMID: 37634203 PMC: 10562973. DOI: 10.2196/51303.
Munger Clary H, Snively B, Topaloglu U, Duncan P, Kimball J, Alexander H JAMIA Open. 2022; 5(4):ooac052.
PMID: 36247085 PMC: 9555875. DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac052.