» Articles » PMID: 36245740

Activated CD4 + T Lymphocyte is a Potential Biomarker for Acute Graft-vs.-host Disease After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Children with Transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia

Overview
Journal Front Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2022 Oct 17
PMID 36245740
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Acute graft-vs.-host disease (aGVHD) is still one of the most common and life-threatening complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Whether or not the level of activated T lymphocytes rises before the onset of aGVHD is unknown. We explored the possibility of T lymphocytes as biomarkers for early prediction of aGVHD in children with transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDTβ).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the characteristics of T lymphocyte subsets before and 14 days after HSCT in children with TDTβ who developed aGVHD. Data from 95 children (Age ≤ 14 years) who underwent allogeneic HSCT from January 2020 to December 2021 were collected. Patients were divided into non-aGVHD group ( = 55) and aGVHD group ( = 40), and aGVHD group was divided into two subgroups: grade I aGVHD ( = 16) and grade II-IV aGVHD ( = 24). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to predict aGVHD.

Results: Before preconditioning in non-aGVHD and aGVHD groups, there was no significant difference in all lymphocyte subsets and ratio of CD4 + /CD8 + T cells. On day 14 post-transplantation in non-aGVHD and aGVHD groups, the absolute concentrations per μl blood of T cells, CD4 + T cells, CD8 + T cells, activated CD4 + T cell and NK cells, were 69.73 (14.70, 137.77) and 140.36 (65.06, 293.42), 10.00 (2.35, 23.59) and 35.91 (12.41, 68.71), 37.25 (5.82, 84.36) and 89.99 (35.83, 180.81), 0.52 (0.17, 2.20) and 4.08 (0.91, 11.12), 43.86 (15.00, 91.31) and 26.35 (15.19, 49.39), respectively. On day + 14 (14 days post-transplantation), the differences in all cell subsets and the ratio of CD4 + /CD8 + T cells were not statistically significant between grade I aGVHD and grade II-IV aGVHD subgroups. The absolute concentrations of CD8 + T cells in grade I aGVHD were significantly higher than in grade II-IV aGVHD [128.21 (61.11, 258.91) vs. 60.81 (21.59, 176.38), = 0.057]. AUC of NK cells, CD8 + T cells, T cells, CD4 + T cells, and CD4 + CD25 + T cells were 0.6275, 0.6839, 0.7068, 0.7241, and 0.7589, and cut-off values were 73.75 (97.50, 34.55), 146.90 (37.50, 94.55), 187.30 (45.00, 90.91), 18.95 (70.00, 72.73), and 3.24 (52.50, 87.27), respectively. The AUC of the combined CD4 + CD25 + T cells and CD8 + T cells, CD4 + CD25 + T cells and T cells, CD4 + CD25 + T cells and CD4 + T cells, CD4 + CD25 + T cells and NK cells, respectively, were 0.7500, 0.7598, 0.7750, and 0.8050.

Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that level of activated CD4 + T cells on day + 14 (post-HSCT) is a valuable biomarker for predicting aGVHD in children with TDTβ and CD8 + T cells could likely be a biomarker for severe aGVHD.

Citing Articles

Soluble ST2 as a Predictive Biomarker for Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease Post -Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Huang K, Yang M, Huang J, Cao Y, Zhou Y, Pang G Clin Transplant. 2025; 39(3):e70108.

PMID: 40033972 PMC: 11877010. DOI: 10.1111/ctr.70108.


Using T-lymphocyte subsets at engraftment to predict the risk of acute graft-versus-host disease in patients with thalassemia major: development of a new predictive nomogram.

Xiao H, Yang G, Huang Q, Wei Z, Gan Z, Wu M Ther Adv Hematol. 2024; 15:20406207241294054.

PMID: 39664034 PMC: 11632902. DOI: 10.1177/20406207241294054.


Application of CD25 and CTLA4 gene transcription levels in early prediction of acute graft-versus-host disease.

Huang K, Yang M, Zhou Y, Cao Y, Pang G, Zhao J Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1410439.

PMID: 39072333 PMC: 11272456. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1410439.

References
1.
Mathias C, Mick R, Grupp S, Duffy K, Harris F, Laport G . Soluble interleukin-2 receptor concentration as a biochemical indicator for acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. J Hematother Stem Cell Res. 2000; 9(3):393-400. DOI: 10.1089/15258160050079506. View

2.
Zeiser R, Blazar B . Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease - Biologic Process, Prevention, and Therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017; 377(22):2167-2179. PMC: 6034180. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra1609337. View

3.
Pasin C, Moy R, Reshef R, Yates A . Variable selection methods for predicting clinical outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):3230. PMC: 7865009. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82562-0. View

4.
He F, Holtan S . Biomarkers in Graft-Versus-Host Disease: from Prediction and Diagnosis to Insights into Complex Graft/Host Interactions. Curr Hematol Malig Rep. 2018; 13(1):44-52. DOI: 10.1007/s11899-018-0433-2. View

5.
Foley R, Couban S, Walker I, Greene K, Chen C, Messner H . Monitoring soluble interleukin-2 receptor levels in related and unrelated donor allogenic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998; 21(8):769-73. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701163. View