» Articles » PMID: 36241918

The Preoperative Hounsfield Unit Value at the Position of the Future Screw Insertion is a Better Predictor of Screw Loosening Than Other Methods

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36241918
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Screw loosening is a widely reported issue after spinal screw fixation and triggers several complications after lumbar interbody fusion. Osteoporosis is an essential risk factor for screw loosening. Hounsfield units (HU) value is a credible indicator during bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation. As compared with the general evaluation of BMD, we hypothesized that specific measurements of HU at the precise location of the future screw insertion may be a better predictor of screw loosening.

Methods: Clinical data of 56 patients treated by oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) of the L4-L5 segments with an anterior lateral single rod (ALSR) screw fixation were reviewed in this study. Vertebral bodies with ≥ 1 mm width radiolucent zones around the screw were defined as screw loosening. HU in the insertional screw positions, the central transverse plane, and the average values of three and four planes were measured. Regression analyses identified independent risk factors for screw loosening separately. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was computed to evaluate predictive performance.

Results: The local HU values were significantly lower in the loosening group, regardless of the selected measuring methods. The AUC of screw loosening prediction was higher in the insertional screw positions' HU than other frequently used methods.

Conclusions: The HU value measured in the insertional screw position is a better predictor of ALSR screw loosening than other methods. The risk of screw loosening should be reduced by optimizing the trajectory of the screw based on the measurement of HU in preoperative CT.

Key Points: • Osteoporosis is an essential risk factor for screw loosening, and Hounsfield units (HU) are a credible predictor during bone mineral density (BMD) evaluation. • The HU value measured in the insertional screw position is a better predictor of screw loosening than other frequently used HU measurement methods. • The risk of screw loosening might potentially be reduced by optimizing the trajectory of the screw based on the measurement of HU in preoperative CT.

Citing Articles

Poor bony density can independently trigger higher incidence of adjacent vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebralplasty: a mono-center retrospective study.

Wan S, Wu Z, Li H, Zhang J, Lin X, Gao T Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025; 410(1):87.

PMID: 40035873 PMC: 11880152. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-025-03649-0.


Opportunistic Osteoporosis Assessment and Fracture Risk Determination Using Cancellous Density Measurement in Hounsfield Units of Native Lumbar Computed Tomography Images-A Comparative Study with Conventional Bone Density Evaluation.

Andresen J, Schroder G, Haider T, Andresen R J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004756 PMC: 11856453. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041226.


The lowest HU value on transverse planes: a predictive factor for cranial adjacent vertebral fracture risk after percutaneous vertebroplasty.

Xi Z, Xie Y, Sun S, Liu M, Li J Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025; 15(2):1275-1286.

PMID: 39995721 PMC: 11847206. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-1559.


The predictive value of endplate morphology and pedicle screw bone quality score on screw loosening after single-level lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Zhan J, Wei Q, Guo W, Liu Z, Chen S, Huang Q J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):898.

PMID: 39741319 PMC: 11689693. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05367-7.


Hounsfield unit to serum pentosidine ratio predicts screw loosening after lumbar interbody fusion.

Arimura D, Kanai T, Shinohara A, Katsumi S, Mori K, Saito M BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):1065.

PMID: 39725963 PMC: 11670394. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-08236-w.


References
1.
Guo H, Tang Y, Guo D, Luo P, Li Y, Mo G . Stability Evaluation of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Constructs with Various Fixation Options: A Finite Element Analysis Based on Three-Dimensional Scanning Models. World Neurosurg. 2020; 138:e530-e538. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.02.180. View

2.
Lv Q, Gao X, Pan X, Jin H, Lou X, Li S . Biomechanical properties of novel transpedicular transdiscal screw fixation with interbody arthrodesis technique in lumbar spine: A finite element study. J Orthop Translat. 2018; 15:50-58. PMC: 6172361. DOI: 10.1016/j.jot.2018.08.005. View

3.
Xi Z, Mummaneni P, Wang M, Ruan H, Burch S, Deviren V . The association between lower Hounsfield units on computed tomography and cage subsidence after lateral lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus. 2020; 49(2):E8. DOI: 10.3171/2020.5.FOCUS20169. View

4.
Reis M, Reyes P, Bse , Altun I, Newcomb A, Singh V . Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016; 25(6):720-726. DOI: 10.3171/2016.4.SPINE151386. View

5.
Bokov A, Bulkin A, Aleynik A, Kutlaeva M, Mlyavykh S . Pedicle Screws Loosening in Patients With Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine: Potential Risk Factors and Relative Contribution. Global Spine J. 2019; 9(1):55-61. PMC: 6362557. DOI: 10.1177/2192568218772302. View