» Articles » PMID: 36237440

Functional Requirements of a Mobile-based Application for Stroke Self-management: A Delphi Study

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36237440
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to determine the functional requirements of a self-management mobile application for stroke survivors. For extracting the initial functional requirements, a literature review as well as interviews with 17 patients and caregivers were done. The results were analyzed using the content analysis method. The initial extracted requirements were then provided to the specialists by the Delphi technique to determine the final functional requirements. Content validity ratio (CVR) and content validity index (CVI) were calculated according to the Lawshe model. Criteria for item approval included CVR > 0.49 and CVI > 0.79. Finally, the approved items were turned into a five-point Likert scale questionnaire and were then provided to 53 experts and items with a mean score higher than 3.75 were approved. Functional requirements including creating a user account, educational material, support services, providing reminders and alerts for drugs administration and physician appointments, and rehabilitation exercises (to improve balance, upper and lower extremities rehabilitation, and activities of daily living (ADLs)) were approved. Most of the approved functional requirements were related to rehabilitation exercises for improving upper limb motor function. The experts did not approve the requirements for using splints and slings or the recommendation to take some medications.

Citing Articles

Functional and Nonfunctional Requirements of Virtual Clinic Mobile Applications: A Systematic Review.

Parsaei Z, Jangi M, Tahmasebian S, Ehteshami A Int J Telemed Appl. 2024; 2024:7800321.

PMID: 38899062 PMC: 11186682. DOI: 10.1155/2024/7800321.


Functional requirements of a mobile-based application for stroke self-management: A Delphi study.

Tadayon H, Masoud S, Nabovati E, Akbari H, Farzandipour M, Babaei M Healthc Technol Lett. 2022; 9(4-5):55-69.

PMID: 36237440 PMC: 9535756. DOI: 10.1049/htl2.12034.

References
1.
Safi S, Thiessen T, Schmailzl K . Acceptance and Resistance of New Digital Technologies in Medicine: Qualitative Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2018; 7(12):e11072. PMC: 6299231. DOI: 10.2196/11072. View

2.
Wantland D, Portillo C, Holzemer W, Slaughter R, McGhee E . The effectiveness of Web-based vs. non-Web-based interventions: a meta-analysis of behavioral change outcomes. J Med Internet Res. 2005; 6(4):e40. PMC: 1550624. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6.4.e40. View

3.
Krishnamurthi R, Feigin V, Forouzanfar M, Mensah G, Connor M, Bennett D . Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990-2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet Glob Health. 2014; 1(5):e259-81. PMC: 4181351. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70089-5. View

4.
Ullberg T, Zia E, Petersson J, Norrving B . Changes in functional outcome over the first year after stroke: an observational study from the Swedish stroke register. Stroke. 2014; 46(2):389-94. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006538. View

5.
Halanski M, Noonan K . Cast and splint immobilization: complications. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008; 16(1):30-40. DOI: 10.5435/00124635-200801000-00005. View