» Articles » PMID: 36229942

Socioeconomic Disparities in Cancer Survival: Relation to Stage at Diagnosis, Treatment, and Centralization of Patients to Accredited Hospitals, 2005-2014, Japan

Overview
Journal Cancer Med
Specialty Oncology
Date 2022 Oct 14
PMID 36229942
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cancer survival varies by socioeconomic status in Japan. We examined the extent to which survival disparities are explained by factors relevant to cancer control measures (promoting early-stage detection, standardizing treatment, and centralizing patients to government-accredited cancer hospitals [ACHs]).

Methods: From the Osaka Cancer Registry, patients diagnosed with solid malignant tumors during 2005-2014 and aged 15-84 years (N = 376,077) were classified into quartiles using the Area Deprivation Index (ADI). Trends in inequalities were assessed for potentially associated factors: early-stage detection, treatment modality, and utilization of ACH (for first contact/diagnosis/treatment). 3-year all-cause survival was computed by the ADI quartile. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to assess survival disparities and their trends through a series of adjustment for the potentially associated factors.

Results: During 2005-2014, the most deprived ADI quartile had lower rates than the least deprived quartile for early-stage detection (42.6% vs. 48.7%); receipt of surgery (58.1% vs. 64.1%); and utilization of ACH (83.5% vs. 88.4%). While rate differences decreased for receipt of surgery and utilization of ACH (Annual Percent Change = -3.2 and - 11.9, respectively) over time, it remained unchanged for early-stage detection. During 2012-2014, the most deprived ADI quartile had lower 3-year survival than the least deprived (59.0% vs. 69.4%) and higher mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR] = 1.32, adjusted for case-mix): this attenuated with additional adjustment for stage at diagnosis (HR = 1.23); treatment modality (HR = 1.20); and utilization of ACH (HR = 1.19) CONCLUSIONS: Despite improvements in equalizing access to quality cancer care during 2005-2014, survival disparities remained. Interventions to reduce inequalities in early-stage detection could ameliorate such gaps.

Citing Articles

Temporal changes in regional variations in cancer survival rates in Osaka, Japan (1997-2015).

Kato M, Morishima T, Sakaniwa R, Nakata K, Kuwabara Y, Ikawa T Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3854.

PMID: 39890938 PMC: 11785978. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88052-x.


Survival Time Disparities after Palliative Care Use Among Low-Income Patients on Social Welfare Programs: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Nishioka D, Kanzaki I, Kihara A Palliat Med Rep. 2024; 5(1):187-193.

PMID: 39050774 PMC: 11265612. DOI: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0077.


Socioeconomic Disparities in Six Common Cancer Survival Rates in South Korea: Population-Wide Retrospective Cohort Study.

Lee J, Park J, Kim N, Nari F, Bae S, Lee H JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024; 10:e55011.

PMID: 39041282 PMC: 11284611. DOI: 10.2196/55011.


Educational inequalities in all-cause and cause-specific mortality in Japan: national census-linked mortality data for 2010-15.

Tanaka H, Katanoda K, Togawa K, Kobayashi Y Int J Epidemiol. 2024; 53(2).

PMID: 38537248 PMC: 10972615. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyae031.


Socioeconomic disparities in cancer survival: Relation to stage at diagnosis, treatment, and centralization of patients to accredited hospitals, 2005-2014, Japan.

Odani S, Tabuchi T, Nakaya T, Morishima T, Nakata K, Kuwabara Y Cancer Med. 2022; 12(5):6077-6091.

PMID: 36229942 PMC: 10028172. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5332.

References
1.
Exarchakou A, Rachet B, Belot A, Maringe C, Coleman M . Impact of national cancer policies on cancer survival trends and socioeconomic inequalities in England, 1996-2013: population based study. BMJ. 2018; 360:k764. PMC: 5850596. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k764. View

2.
Zaitsu M, Kobayashi Y, Myagmar-Ochir E, Takeuchi T, Kobashi G, Kawachi I . Occupational disparities in survival from common cancers in Japan: Analysis of Kanagawa cancer registry. Cancer Epidemiol. 2022; 77:102115. DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102115. View

3.
Finke I, Behrens G, Maier W, Schwettmann L, Pritzkuleit R, Holleczek B . Small-area analysis on socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival for 25 cancer sites in Germany. Int J Cancer. 2021; 149(3):561-572. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33553. View

4.
Kim H, Fay M, Feuer E, Midthune D . Permutation tests for joinpoint regression with applications to cancer rates. Stat Med. 2000; 19(3):335-51. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(20000215)19:3<335::aid-sim336>3.0.co;2-z. View

5.
Gorey K, Luginaah I, Holowaty E, Fung K, Hamm C . Breast cancer survival in ontario and california, 1998-2006: socioeconomic inequity remains much greater in the United States. Ann Epidemiol. 2009; 19(2):121-4. PMC: 2910756. DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2008.10.010. View