» Articles » PMID: 36226960

Water Stress-Driven Changes in Bacterial Cell Surface Properties

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Increased drought intensity and frequency exposes soil bacteria to prolonged water stress. While numerous studies reported on behavioral and physiological mechanisms of bacterial adaptation to water stress, changes in bacterial cell surface properties during adaptation are not well researched. We studied adaptive changes in cell surface hydrophobicity (CSH) after exposure to osmotic (NaCl) and matric stress (polyethylene glycol 8000 [PEG 8000]) for six typical soil bacteria (Bacillus subtilis, Arthrobacter chlorophenolicus, Pseudomonas fluorescens, Novosphingobium aromaticivorans, Rhodococcus erythropolis, and Mycobacterium pallens) covering a wide range of cell surface properties. Additional physicochemical parameters (surface chemical composition, surface charge, cell size and stiffness) of B. subtilis and P. fluorescens were analyzed to understand their possible contribution to CSH development. Changes in CSH caused by osmotic and matric stress depend on strain and stress type. CSH of B. subtilis and P. fluorescens increased with stress intensity, R. erythropolis and exhibited a generally high but constant contact angle, while the response of and depended on growth conditions and stress type. Osmotically driven changes in CSH of B. subtilis and P. fluorescens are accompanied by increasing surface N/C ratio, suggesting an increase in protein concentration within the cell wall. Cell envelope proteins thus presumably control bacterial CSH in two ways: (i) by increases in the relative density of surface proteins due to efflux of cytoplasmic water and subsequent cell shrinkage, and (ii) by destabilization of cell wall proteins, resulting in conformational changes which render the surface more hydrophobic. Changes in precipitation frequency, intensity, and temporal distribution are projected to result in increased frequency and intensity of droughts and heavy rainfall events. Prolonged droughts can promote the development of soil water repellency (SWR); this impacts the infiltration and distribution of water in the soil profile, exposing soil microorganisms to water stress. Exposure to water stress has recently been reported to result in increased cell surface hydrophobicity. However, the mechanism of this development is poorly understood. This study investigates the changes in the physicochemical properties of bacterial cell surfaces under water stress as a possible mechanism of increased surface hydrophobicity. Our results improve understanding of the microbial response to water stress in terms of surface properties, the variations in stress response depending on cell wall composition, and its contribution to the development of SWR.

Citing Articles

The variations of native plasmids greatly affect the cell surface hydrophobicity of sphingomonads.

Song D, Chen X, Yao H, Kong G, Xu M, Guo J mSystems. 2023; 8(6):e0086223.

PMID: 37909742 PMC: 10734547. DOI: 10.1128/msystems.00862-23.


Hypertonic stress induced changes of Pseudomonas fluorescens adhesion towards soil minerals studied by AFM.

Abu Quba A, Goebel M, Karagulyan M, Miltner A, Kastner M, Bachmann J Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):17146.

PMID: 37816775 PMC: 10564757. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-44256-7.


Changes in cell surface properties of by adaptation to NaCl induced hypertonic stress.

Abu Quba A, Goebel M, Karagulyan M, Miltner A, Kastner M, Bachmann J FEMS Microbes. 2023; 4:xtac028.

PMID: 37333443 PMC: 10169395. DOI: 10.1093/femsmc/xtac028.


Whole Genome Sequencing of the Novel Probiotic Strain FCa3L.

Karaseva O, Ozhegov G, Khusnutdinova D, Siniagina M, Anisimova E, Akhatova F Microorganisms. 2023; 11(5).

PMID: 37317208 PMC: 10224263. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11051234.


A phenazine-inspired framework for identifying biological functions of microbial redox-active metabolites.

Thalhammer K, Newman D Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2023; 75:102320.

PMID: 37201291 PMC: 10524139. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2023.102320.

References
1.
Oren A . Bioenergetic aspects of halophilism. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999; 63(2):334-48. PMC: 98969. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.63.2.334-348.1999. View

2.
Okuda S, Sherman D, Silhavy T, Ruiz N, Kahne D . Lipopolysaccharide transport and assembly at the outer membrane: the PEZ model. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016; 14(6):337-45. PMC: 4937791. DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.25. View

3.
Meyer R, Zhou X, Tang L, Arpanaei A, Kingshott P, Besenbacher F . Immobilisation of living bacteria for AFM imaging under physiological conditions. Ultramicroscopy. 2010; 110(11):1349-57. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2010.06.010. View

4.
Marrese M, Guarino V, Ambrosio L . Atomic Force Microscopy: A Powerful Tool to Address Scaffold Design in Tissue Engineering. J Funct Biomater. 2017; 8(1). PMC: 5371880. DOI: 10.3390/jfb8010007. View

5.
Halder S, Yadav K, Sarkar R, Mukherjee S, Saha P, Haldar S . Alteration of Zeta potential and membrane permeability in bacteria: a study with cationic agents. Springerplus. 2015; 4:672. PMC: 4633473. DOI: 10.1186/s40064-015-1476-7. View