Evaluation of Aerosol Drug Delivery with Concurrent Low- and High-flow Nasal Oxygen
Overview
Affiliations
Question Addressed By Study: Administration of aerosol to patients receiving high-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) ranges from concurrent aerosol delivery by mouthpiece to aerosol cannula alone. This study examines the conditions to provide optimal aerosol delivery with low- or high-flow nasal oxygen with concurrent mouthpiece or through nasal cannula alone, and the impact on fugitive aerosols.
Materials And Methods: A vibrating mesh nebuliser delivered salbutamol mouthpiece, aerosol holding chamber and nasal cannula to an adult head model simulating relaxed breathing. The mean±sd inhaled dose (%) was assayed from a filter distal to the trachea. Optical particle sizers were used to measure fugitive aerosol concentrations during aerosol delivery.
Results: Concurrent low-flow nasal oxygen (LFNO) and aerosol delivery with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber increased the inhaled dose (%) available, 31.44±1.33% when supplemented with 2 L·min of nasal oxygen. Concurrent HFNO above 30 L·min resulted in a lower inhaled dose (%) compared to aerosol delivered through HFNO alone. The addition of concurrent LFNO or HFNO resulted in no increase in aerosol levels in the test room.
Answer To Question Posed: Concurrent LFNO with a mouthpiece and aerosol holding chamber is an effective and safe means of aerosol delivery.
MacLoughlin R, Mac Giolla Eain M Pharmaceutics. 2024; 16(4).
PMID: 38675226 PMC: 11053618. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16040565.
Mac Giolla Eain M, MacLoughlin R Pharmaceutics. 2023; 15(12).
PMID: 38140020 PMC: 10747070. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15122679.
Mac Giolla Eain M, Nolan K, Murphy B, McCaul C, MacLoughlin R J Clin Monit Comput. 2023; 37(5):1265-1273.
PMID: 36930390 PMC: 10022553. DOI: 10.1007/s10877-023-00990-x.